Re: [DNSOP] new ANAME draft: draft-hunt-dnsop-aname-00.txt

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Wed, 12 April 2017 09:48 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4481913151E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 02:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8SJW8HVsPeAU for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 02:48:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36CD8131512 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 02:48:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:39616) by ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.139]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1cyEt0-0005cn-QY (Exim 4.89) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:48:26 +0100
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:48:26 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1704111506120.15830@bofh.nohats.ca>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1704121043560.17501@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <20170407181139.GB66383@isc.org> <cc3bbc7a-3f48-2f7f-a3d9-3f752874fc00@redhat.com> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1704111641290.4393@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1704111147390.8670@bofh.nohats.ca> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1704111928520.4393@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1704111506120.15830@bofh.nohats.ca>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/WBIPkRiFeIgTBe5viF2t3owseAU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] new ANAME draft: draft-hunt-dnsop-aname-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:48:31 -0000

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
>
> Hmm okay. Although you could just make a real zone cut there and then it
> becomes the APEX case again :P

Well, this is the kind of "just" that involves a huge co-ordination cost
updating the configuration of on-site and off-site secondary servers, and
may have billing implications if you exceed your zone quota on a
commercial provider.

> I'm not sure ANAME's make deployment corner cases easier :P

They would greatly simplify things for me.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/  -  I xn--zr8h punycode
Fitzroy: Easterly or northeasterly 4 or 5, occasionally 6 in southeast. Slight
or moderate. Occasional rain later. Good, occasionally moderate later.