IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [dnsext] Re: Computerworld apparently has changed DNS protocol

Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> Wed, 04 November 2009 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D234D3A682A for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:24:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lhQgzbnj3rzq for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:24:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.enyo.de (mail.enyo.de [212.9.189.167]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048623A67DF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:24:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from deneb.vpn.enyo.de ([212.9.189.177] helo=deneb.enyo.de) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp id 1N5mPJ-00048c-OU; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:24:41 +0100
Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <fw@deneb.enyo.de>) id 1N5mPI-00006H-Uk; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:24:40 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: Matthew Dempsky <matthew@dempsky.org>
References: <200911041858.TAA24009@TR-Sys.de> <FD44BF39-5B62-4689-AC6D-8DFFAF340EA1@icsi.berkeley.edu> <20091104192634.GA31981@vacation.karoshi.com.> <d791b8790911041141k71066fa9nede54d5dff9394fa@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:24:40 +0100
In-Reply-To: <d791b8790911041141k71066fa9nede54d5dff9394fa@mail.gmail.com> (Matthew Dempsky's message of "Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:41:42 -0800")
Message-ID: <87aaz2rqbb.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com, Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@icsi.berkeley.edu>, Alfred HÎnes <ah@tr-sys.de>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [dnsext] Re: Computerworld apparently has changed DNS protocol
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:24:34 -0000

* Matthew Dempsky:

> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:26 AM,  <bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:
>>        The current deployment plan is to stage things to push out large responses
>>        early - prior to having any actual DNSSEC usable data ... ostensibly to
>>        flush out DNSmtu problems.
>
> Is this plan to push out large responses indiscriminately, or only
> in response to queries with DO=1?

Eh, the protocol requires that those are sent only with DO=1.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email