Re: [DNSOP] Computerworld apparently has changed DNS protocol

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Wed, 04 November 2009 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A503A68D4 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:02:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kxQ8IjuwIB9v for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:02:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from virtualized.org (trantor.virtualized.org [204.152.189.190]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874D43A63D3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:02:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394438DEE71; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:02:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at virtualized.org
Received: from virtualized.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (trantor.virtualized.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5+jWkMQwpX0Z; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:02:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.62.247] (72-254-61-140.client.stsn.net [72.254.61.140]) by virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383E38DEE65; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:02:32 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <FD44BF39-5B62-4689-AC6D-8DFFAF340EA1@icsi.berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:02:30 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <088AD8CD-0245-4F5E-9159-ECF92E9D6B83@virtualized.org>
References: <200911041858.TAA24009@TR-Sys.de> <FD44BF39-5B62-4689-AC6D-8DFFAF340EA1@icsi.berkeley.edu>
To: Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Computerworld apparently has changed DNS protocol
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:02:12 -0000

[namedroppers dropped as this felt more operational to me]

On Nov 4, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Nicholas Weaver wrote:
> Question:  Have people been able to estimate how large the signed root zone response will be?

Response to what?  Using the current IANA 'normal root servers' testbed:

% dig +bufsize=4096 +dnssec @root.iana.org . ns | grep rcvd
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 801
% dig +bufsize=4096 +dnssec @root.iana.org . soa | grep rcvd
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 1016
% dig +bufsize=4096 +dnssec @root.iana.org . rrsig | grep rcvd
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 2005
% dig +bufsize=4096 +dnssec @root.iana.org x a | grep rcvd
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 639

Regards,
-drc