IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [dnsext] Re: Computerworld apparently has changed DNS protocol

Matthew Dempsky <matthew@dempsky.org> Wed, 04 November 2009 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew@dempsky.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909F228C114 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:41:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.925
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.925 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jc0YSrvtOBLH for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:41:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-px0-f171.google.com (mail-px0-f171.google.com [209.85.216.171]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B4D3A67AB for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:41:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pxi1 with SMTP id 1so5538808pxi.32 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:41:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.138.10 with SMTP id l10mr2870478wad.3.1257363702107; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:41:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20091104192634.GA31981@vacation.karoshi.com.>
References: <200911041858.TAA24009@TR-Sys.de> <FD44BF39-5B62-4689-AC6D-8DFFAF340EA1@icsi.berkeley.edu> <20091104192634.GA31981@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:41:42 -0800
Message-ID: <d791b8790911041141k71066fa9nede54d5dff9394fa@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthew Dempsky <matthew@dempsky.org>
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:14:03 -0800
Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, Alfred HÎnes <ah@tr-sys.de>, Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@icsi.berkeley.edu>, dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [dnsext] Re: Computerworld apparently has changed DNS protocol
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:42:42 -0000

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:26 AM,  <bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:
>        The current deployment plan is to stage things to push out large responses
>        early - prior to having any actual DNSSEC usable data ... ostensibly to
>        flush out DNSmtu problems.

Is this plan to push out large responses indiscriminately, or only in
response to queries with DO=1?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email