IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [dnsext] Re: Computerworld apparently has changed DNS protocol

Matthew Dempsky <matthew@dempsky.org> Wed, 04 November 2009 23:42 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew@dempsky.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66503A6A44 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:42:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.576, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zmsCaJa44g2Z for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:42:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-px0-f171.google.com (mail-px0-f171.google.com [209.85.216.171]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009A43A6822 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:42:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pxi1 with SMTP id 1so5690994pxi.32 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:42:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.115.102.16 with SMTP id e16mr3328406wam.202.1257378163931; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:42:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <A7FB8915-5E5B-479A-A0EA-4E9A4AD13B16@nzrs.net.nz>
References: <200911041858.TAA24009@TR-Sys.de> <FD44BF39-5B62-4689-AC6D-8DFFAF340EA1@icsi.berkeley.edu> <20091104192634.GA31981@vacation.karoshi.com.> <d791b8790911041141k71066fa9nede54d5dff9394fa@mail.gmail.com> <8643905B-B73B-4D87-A1CE-F218E4BA9FD4@virtualized.org> <d791b8790911041345u378d9525i1cfc48251fe2d132@mail.gmail.com> <A7FB8915-5E5B-479A-A0EA-4E9A4AD13B16@nzrs.net.nz>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:42:43 -0800
Message-ID: <d791b8790911041542q8667049w71f89c256a0cc0f6@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthew Dempsky <matthew@dempsky.org>
To: Jay Daley <jay@nzrs.net.nz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:20:02 -0800
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [dnsext] Re: Computerworld apparently has changed DNS protocol
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:42:26 -0000

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Jay Daley <jay@nzrs.net.nz> wrote:
> As far as I am aware, yes it is real DNSSEC data so yes it will require DO=1
> but the keys will be dummy keys (i.e. secret) that cannot be configured as
> trust anchors and so the signatures will be ignored.  At the end of that
> phase, real keys will be used and published.
>
> See
>
> http://sel.icann.org/meetings/seoul2009/presentation-dnssec-workshop-lamb-28oct09-en.pdf
>
> for more details

I see now.  Thanks for clarifying.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email