Re: [DNSOP] [dnsext] Computerworld apparently has changed DNS protocol

Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de> Wed, 04 November 2009 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <A.Hoenes@TR-Sys.de>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E7D3A6784 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:56:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.043
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.043 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.792, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TA84NN9zSE6z for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:56:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TR-Sys.de (gateway.tr-sys.de [213.178.172.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9A23A63D3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:56:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ZEUS.TR-Sys.de by w. with ESMTP ($Revision: 1.37.109.26 $/16.3.2) id AA073444569; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 20:56:09 +0100
Received: (from ah@localhost) by z.TR-Sys.de (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183)/8.7.3) id UAA24191; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 20:56:08 +0100 (MEZ)
From: Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de>
Message-Id: <200911041956.UAA24191@TR-Sys.de>
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:56:07 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20091104192751.GB31981@vacation.karoshi.com.> from "bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com" at Nov "4, " 2009 "07:27:51" pm
X-Mailer: ELM [$Revision: 1.17.214.3 $]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="hp-roman8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [dnsext] Computerworld apparently has changed DNS protocol
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:56:44 -0000

Bill Manning wrote:

>       cool eh?  although I suspect she ment responses.
>
> --bill

Yet responses usually did not go *to* the root servers so far.
I'm getting confused.    :-)  :-)

Did anybody ever have a prejudice against journalists?
-- reconsider, please!  :-)

  Alfred.

P.S.: Disclosing that the writer was female seemed politically
      incorrect to me, so I purposely avoided this detail.


> On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 07:58:41PM +0100, Alfred Hönes wrote:
>> Interesting News!
>>
>> There must be a hidden trick to introduce DNS Jumbograms we just
>> forgot to mention ....
>>
>>
>> In a press article [1] entitled
>>     "Root zone changes may shake up Net in Africa",
>> Computerworld wrote:
>>
>> | From January 2010, ICANN will implement DNSSEC -- using a technique
>> | also known as root signing -- on the root zone, which will affect
>> | the performance of the Internet.  Currently, queries from domain
>> | servers to the root are 512 kilobytes or less, but DNSSEC will make
>>                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> | them larger because it introduces new signatures and keys as part
>>   ^^^^^^^^^^^
>> | of the security features.
>>
>>
>> :-}
>>
>>
>> [1]
>>   http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140123/Root_zone_changes_may_shake_up_Net_in_Africa
>