Re: [DNSOP] Alternative Special-Use TLD problem statement draft

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 06 April 2016 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC6712D09F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 08:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yVj1WAGtcQFj for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 08:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30C4C12D8D8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 08:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.63] (dhcp-8990.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.139.144] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id u36FDrtx052534 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Apr 2016 08:13:57 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host dhcp-8990.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.139.144] (may be forged) claimed to be [10.32.60.63]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 12:13:53 -0300
Message-ID: <02BC1B94-AC3A-49A8-8595-45B3AF56B35E@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A44227@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM>
References: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A44227@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/WnTyt9SlIkIoNlMc6ObgdQcBLgg>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Alternative Special-Use TLD problem statement draft
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:18:10 -0000

On 5 Apr 2016, at 16:35, Ted Lemon wrote:

> I wrote about six pages of comments on the recently-submitted 
> special-use TLD problem statement document.   However, ultimately I 
> concluded that it would be easier to just write what I thought the 
> problem statement should look like rather than try to suggest (and 
> then no doubt discuss one by one) a large set of changes that I think 
> it needs.
>
> So this weekend I spent quite a bit of time talking to various people 
> who I knew would have insight into the question, and the result is the 
> draft I just submitted.  Ralph Droms was instrumental in inspiring me 
> to write the document, and helped me out by doing an initial review.
>
> I've included the submission announcement below.   I realize that this 
> is a woefully late submission for discussion at IETF 95, since I 
> mostly wrote it yesterday, _at_ IETF 95.   However, I think it may 
> serve as a better starting point for the discussion than the current 
> problem statement draft, so if you have time to read it, I would 
> genuinely appreciate it if you could give it a look.

Clarifying question: are you formally requesting the WG to stop work on 
draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem and switch to this one? If not, 
what do think we should do about the two?

--Paul Hoffman