IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Alternative Special-Use TLD problem statement draft

"Adrien de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com> Thu, 07 April 2016 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <adrien@qbik.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCBC12D6C2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fd0jb1XtsU5s for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.qbik.com (smtp.qbik.com [122.56.26.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41A2A12D667 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: From [192.168.1.146] (unverified [192.168.1.146]) by SMTP Server [192.168.1.3] (WinGate SMTP Receiver v8.5.6 (Build 4877)) with SMTP id <0000693528@smtp.qbik.com>; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 08:25:27 +1200
From: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 20:25:27 +0000
Message-Id: <em85fa5ec8-2d6a-441a-83a2-126019a7f8bb@bodybag>
In-Reply-To: <20160407145713.GA16603@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
User-Agent: eM_Client/6.0.24928.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/fRrrjhR3YD5RpOasE1VlS5kKI84>
Cc: Philip Homburg <pch-dnsop@u-1.phicoh.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Alternative Special-Use TLD problem statement draft
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 20:25:34 -0000

Hi Stephane

don't worry, I didn't take it that way.  For me, the concept of 
perversion and LGBT are entirely independent, and I think people who 
associate the 2 concepts need to look at their own prejudices.

Regards

Adrien de Croy


------ Original Message ------
From: "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: "Adrien de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>
Cc: "Philip Homburg" <pch-dnsop@u-1.phicoh.com>; "dnsop@ietf.org" 
<dnsop@ietf.org>
Sent: 8/04/2016 2:57:13 a.m.
Subject: Re: Alternative Special-Use TLD problem statement draft

>On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 09:35:32AM -0300,
>  Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote
>  a message of 25 lines which said:
>
>>  From the discussion at the IETF plenary yesterday evening, I got the
>>  feeling that IETF 100 in Singapore will be clean of perversions :-)
>
>I've been told it was a bad joke, and it could be interpreted as
>anti-LGBT people. Since it was *not* the intended goal, I withdraw it,
>sorry.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email