Re: [DNSOP] Alternative Special-Use TLD problem statement draft

Philip Homburg <pch-dnsop@u-1.phicoh.com> Wed, 06 April 2016 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-bBB316E3E@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE0712D7F4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 08:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CxasFH-PPdpY for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 08:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo6-he.hq.phicoh.net [IPv6:2001:470:d16a:10:2a0:c9ff:fe9f:17a9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E48712D1DF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 08:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (Smail #91) id m1anp1K-0000CzC; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 17:05:26 +0200
Message-Id: <m1anp1K-0000CzC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
From: Philip Homburg <pch-dnsop@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-bBB316E3E@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A44227@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM> <m1anlSH-0000IqC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20160406115243.GA14413@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <20160406122131.GA15698@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 6 Apr 2016 09:21:31 -0300 ." <20160406122131.GA15698@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 17:05:26 +0200
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zaI9QKODtJOJvDXVEevE3Kg6aEE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Alternative Special-Use TLD problem statement draft
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:08:40 -0000

In your letter dated Wed, 6 Apr 2016 09:21:31 -0300 you wrote:
>> Strong dissensus here. The problem is there is no safe way to have AND
>> KEEP such a name.
>
>Also, it would make very difficult to DNS programmers to keep track of
>all these "special but not special" domain names. 

Personally, I consider naming systems developed outside the IETF a problem.

There should be no register, because they should not exist.

So any hint that there is a process for non-IETF naming systems should
be removed.

Naming at the root of the name space should develop very slowly. Slow
enough that everybody (local name resolution, but also security mechanisms)
can adapt.

These systems should be considered carefully for all implications before they
are deployed. And not just pop up.