IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Alternative Special-Use TLD problem statement draft

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Thu, 07 April 2016 00:53 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28EC912D801 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 17:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IBO68M_Vxpbl for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 17:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39C4E12D7FF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 17:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id l6so4508393wml.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 17:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=xm15ugKF6rgDk8M4qReetImu1fPB1/8uo1yaLwB8p6s=; b=lKasuUo+TcVrfr/DALzRYUsTEyVXPD1SVyCwH86fFoNfomllZI2iBLjWMsNewmKP/B LLXskiLPtwvX3NwFq/Ncoe1HVCe75IAahBSWZuYhuiiWGt3zSgUt4zASMBRFaQSq5Yeg R+YP6t1q51yGjUE4S77WT5iUkk1HebqzCUjUYFApWZ4fR9u3l1dFPdzSYTly6kCCyqTh YNhxCEZQDS5f6Jj4ZSgd4jdDKhRy5sj8FBJaQ5U9IgWRD9enFsWaRVUKP2/r5qIcudpY E3nE2+ayE1p4WiN0tGcsiXTfSd3db5MoTt8+t9rlG8oJ5I/lhWKgWz1vz8VjhfAcJXhr +daA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=xm15ugKF6rgDk8M4qReetImu1fPB1/8uo1yaLwB8p6s=; b=NRmy47bSFEI6CH5VlXSLbT29IG6OkiAdWzlpIJ91Jpkv8dVZiONCY9niou2QCUdsoe trxOjzFQI+gCoMOfqlWv/mkbF/86R6pWR9iBFIXFyv4QdfSsWjMGEDzslMw5I6mMwLs5 Z34Ppoz8lEWbZbe2MgTZd142VbUxreMqonznRKMBt7m1Mzki4mZ16JZt0Nqjveswu5MU YTM746I+9gskgiq9rXUiFw5SGQLYydD4074vfFANB3qK3yuNwHq2P9zd8YK9zuHIL6rZ 6dmV1lHM0+ECYGxfENqGXMyFYxKYLVdryB1ZpZOZ4U1/vdq43+ov9/3/RP0J/1hvu4vE GZOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLIuFl6WYuuwwTKpnpZN7HXOKHgZIKX+J/0HZ6GRrVjF+BfT+ylNzF7nkyOiCU0RA==
X-Received: by 10.28.182.194 with SMTP id g185mr27205486wmf.41.1459990384729; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 17:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-a2ab.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-a2ab.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.162.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e80sm629083wma.1.2016.04.06.17.53.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 06 Apr 2016 17:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3BDC6447-AD6E-444E-9853-6D2597A16716"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <m1anp1K-0000CzC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 21:52:59 -0300
Message-Id: <FE146F00-3663-4042-9E41-ED62D0DB64DA@virtualized.org>
References: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A44227@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM> <m1anlSH-0000IqC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20160406115243.GA14413@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <20160406122131.GA15698@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <m1anp1K-0000CzC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-dnsop@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/bxBoFurGbGWY0uWWjDZ_3202i9Y>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Alternative Special-Use TLD problem statement draft
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:53:08 -0000

>> Also, it would make very difficult to DNS programmers to keep track of
>> all these "special but not special" domain names.
> 
> Personally, I consider naming systems developed outside the IETF a problem.
> 
> There should be no register, because they should not exist.

This appears to assume that naming systems are only developed in the IETF or that a naming system not developed in the IETF is not relevant/impactful.

I don't think this is a good assumption.

Regards,
-drc
(speaking only for myself)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email