IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 05 August 2020 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3A73A0870 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 07:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vMEZes8ZuXLP for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 07:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x729.google.com (mail-qk1-x729.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::729]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 551333A08D4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 07:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x729.google.com with SMTP id l6so41693227qkc.6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 07:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=7j3y1rjX8svgMn2LfR6d6MtHS/BvuJE0wsEb7dD/eJo=; b=lb2Q9gdPep1uc25TmktSpgfAlyW50W7zd12xjbjoJ/H47YFFn+GPAUsNBklKGypNpd tKvpMgbhjbuJI5RXKF7fKS6A2yLm5haI1ftzG2yqaHm87VAVjQRk08P/4lIadsvyGcGc L9HRlVEiAkHLw3v2QSWCEp+bKj/3RH07e3dCvXiE1rWwcf7rj7PaBS8gYAdLmtLQFrMg lIie6dTcvvcvaC17pT+HfBZGEMPTqfivHeCDIqQVMSkboXMLif4MFD/9WtTq1iInupRe c561+suHoBbnb+tcpL1qrkQUZeQwLFc8O6O085kx062yQu5vOdo2swepKi5GaS1K6Y68 Pwrg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=7j3y1rjX8svgMn2LfR6d6MtHS/BvuJE0wsEb7dD/eJo=; b=QW67g2HSQbKxYprFVGg0d4AnRkk9Gdr7aL8PfDdL5nB0cOrTIFxnrGZ8/I6dAaREVf IjiugAdIp9O5dGD0P0/MK82YYXr5sdWBC5lkLsGmDtnIhhEmujBkX4VnRWQPV94RkQ1/ /6rhWc/LmWu4GKmSpuIWYJb2OwniMzuYRHg9Z2lkixxJESzBxE/tph6haq8skJa07gOl yV1K4LtCojkWsbGOadT33t8kchMi7xecV5LSVZsIetthJrDhmKhdyIIwcPTfBENi2uPr NeV5JfX6ct5yyWqWz7dOBtktvnvqhBw7wRD94qmBM3XfxO10HmVYbudvuaeVzAoh6NSD SHHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533nzs/v+aW01GwKT8y5XktiA5BVXz7MQQKr56ERI7oJHsMxQcVf kRVHfFUMeohu7ZmqqZDRiUvwHw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwvyyhwQRJNFw4OFn+pVNw05I5tV8rgxQ+/w1IkkAu1bgdgDskwCilGcFpZF7Tq/iZV3LARww==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:b942:: with SMTP id j63mr3406945qkf.138.1596636038219; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 07:00:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:343a:3af0:7ddd:fe26? ([2601:18b:300:36ee:343a:3af0:7ddd:fe26]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 9sm2084916qtg.4.2020.08.05.07.00.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Aug 2020 07:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <00775B69-C0E9-473C-A311-C07BDF263603@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D5558C85-84BD-45D6-B0CE-9693B736EDFC"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 10:00:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <9fa12cfddbddbf7dda342564537934c3a244afdc.camel@nixmagic.com>
Cc: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>, dnsop@ietf.org
To: Michael De Roover <ietf@nixmagic.com>
References: <86c18e80-88ab-5503-f63c-f788766a2675@ghnou.su> <5303244.dBo8Fx6Cfl@linux-9daj> <c535e2eba885a82fb4fd6e967884498473b6c099.camel@nixmagic.com> <1725851.NVhN7QJb2C@linux-9daj> <9fa12cfddbddbf7dda342564537934c3a244afdc.camel@nixmagic.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/motYNugegPZef9BGDNIvHtny1VQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 14:01:05 -0000

On Aug 5, 2020, at 9:46 AM, Michael De Roover <ietf@nixmagic.com> wrote:
> Honestly I wouldn't change it at all.

This decision has already been made; debating it further isn’t going to be fruitful.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email