IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements

Peter Thomassen <peter@desec.io> Thu, 15 December 2022 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@desec.io>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3586DC14CF02 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 05:46:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=a4a.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ozCD9nOJmm8s for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 05:46:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.a4a.de (mail.a4a.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:10a:1d5c:8000::8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25300C14CE38 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 05:46:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=a4a.de; s=20170825; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=41tjAYr6pyI8xrTOjFOZfiKusSj0G24nRN8tmVboJh8=; b=EB6lHr9EC0OnAy2k1RTesqA0Gn QTMGMGYcqdF5zSGxbDX60UxMLb0Q6Bef2dnh4YjvowhvXlbaNphRfpqcKtYv4jURH+/ZLxGAj64O1 N764Cz7E1U1gmnufT68TMzo9R6i9PEGBLakFr9M2gtiN8JZF/sl/eHiGkiZRXA54INYXduPmPJjQg yrgf2j+JY+k6bCwab5CMCoPoJ9JNS6QtEquRyLcG6OIkAaivoEjcBq88ReKpOdaEkhacd6e0kucUK tEYGxbQnmcxPGbFdPKO8yv6Wf3aTpq/6lDTVpyGXUC8/eI1cAn3L+Pt5KeoOhWIYjGgIc00BZbRje 7V4zmmRg==;
Received: from business-90-187-67-221.pool2.vodafone-ip.de ([90.187.67.221] helo=[192.168.188.94]) by mail.a4a.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <peter@desec.io>) id 1p5oYj-0002Za-Px for dnsop@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2022 14:46:04 +0100
Message-ID: <e8f3d519-9152-4caf-1fe0-d5e509ca4802@desec.io>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 14:45:51 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2
Content-Language: en-US
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <CADyWQ+FwRaSdpSWXBDqCG9ZPNPiG4pGUx37PVtExbqVPr5ZfmA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Thomassen <peter@desec.io>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+FwRaSdpSWXBDqCG9ZPNPiG4pGUx37PVtExbqVPr5ZfmA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/p7zamoUp4Sx_TYT3rZgD_Mqh8Ro>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 13:46:12 -0000

Hi,

In what sense is this document "informational" when it is called "validator requirements", or, conversely, in what sense does it spell out "requirements" when it is only "informational" and not "standards track"?

Best,
Peter


On 10/19/22 21:21, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> 
> 
> This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements
> 
> Current versions of the draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements/>
> 
> The Current Intended Status of this document is: Informational
> 
> Please review the draft and offer relevant comments.
> If this does not seem appropriate please speak out.
> If someone feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak out with your reasons.
> 
> This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on:  2 November 2022
> 
> thanks
> tim
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

-- 
Like our community service? đź’›
Please consider donating at

https://desec.io/

deSEC e.V.
Kyffhäuserstr. 5
10781 Berlin
Germany

Vorstandsvorsitz: Nils Wisiol
Registergericht: AG Berlin (Charlottenburg) VR 37525

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email