Re: [dnssd] Further IPR disclosures on draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-05 ?

Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Thu, 12 March 2015 13:27 UTC

Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 7C1AD1A00A2; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540651A00A2; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id opekiMfHgPWs; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127441A00F4; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MB.local (h194.viagenie.ca [206.123.31.194]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9845840218; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:27:20 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <55019436.4010106@viagenie.ca>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:27:18 -0400
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements.all@ietf.org
References: <20150312020708.27620.27985.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <64537593-69EF-43FA-8660-58812A265EFB@nominum.com> <A494098B-8360-4B79-BEDC-657A8B72F91C@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|4e17462205535732b1efd4c738f85d5cr2BD4J03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|A494098B-8360-4B79-BEDC-657A8B72F91C@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|4e17462205535732b1efd4c738f85d5cr2BD4J03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|A494098B-8360-4B79-BEDC-657A8B72F91C@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000408060408020601020609"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/EsyvAJ4N4bIrqgqLxP3m6EYLAz4>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:59:03 -0700
Cc: dnssd-chairs@ietf.org, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] Further IPR disclosures on draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-05 ?
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:27:21 -0000

Le 2015-03-12 09:04, Tim Chown a écrit :
> Kerry, Stuart, Marc, Daniel,
>
> Please can you confirm whether there is any additional IPR on the 
> requirements draft as per Ted’s request below?

not on my side. Marc.

>
> As per my other email just now, I understood that the IPR statement on 
> the requirements draft (i.e. 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2114/) had intended to be on the 
> hybrid solution draft (i.e. https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2119/ ).
>
> Apologies for this extra late (hopefully small) hurdle.
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
>> On 12 Mar 2015, at 02:19, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com 
>> <mailto:Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 11, 2015, at 10:07 PM, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com 
>> <mailto:presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>> wrote:
>>>  The draft includes the boilerplate confirming that the document "is
>>>  submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP
>>>  79". No disclosures have been made, nor are expected to be made in an
>>>  Informational requirements draft.
>>
>> Argh, sorry, I didn't catch that.   Tim, please ask the authors to 
>> say explicitly whether they are aware of any additional IPR.   The 
>> boilerplate isn't adequate, because it is added by a tool, and is not 
>> present in the XML source.
>>
>>> There was an IPR disclosure made on the earlier pre-WG version of this
>>> document back in 2013. Were the authors asked whether that disclosure
>>> also applies to this version of the document? Is the WG aware of this
>>> disclosure? Did the WG discuss the disclosure? Were any concerns raised?
>>
>> Hm.   This has certainly come up in meetings.   I think the only time 
>> it was mentioned on the mailing list was prior to the BoF that 
>> produced dnssd.   The disclosure has been in the tracker all along. 
>>   Are you suggesting that the working group may have agreed to 
>> advance the document without being aware of this, despite the IPR 
>> having been present in the tracker?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dnssd mailing list
>> dnssd@ietf.org <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd
>