IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnssd] Further IPR disclosures on draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-05 ?

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 12 March 2015 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnssd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 2F3BD1A885E; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 08:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02151A88AB; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 08:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UUQRDy-BRG2t; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 08:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBD101A885E; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 08:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-03.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A118EDA03EE; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 15:57:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.0.20.107] (71.233.43.215) by CAS-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 08:57:52 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <5501AB6C.5080106@viagenie.ca>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:57:48 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <72B9E980-F231-48E3-87E5-090504F9D545@nominum.com>
References: <20150312020708.27620.27985.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <64537593-69EF-43FA-8660-58812A265EFB@nominum.com> <A494098B-8360-4B79-BEDC-657A8B72F91C@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|4e17462205535732b1efd4c738f85d5cr2BD4J03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|A494098B-8360-4B79-BEDC-657A8B72F91C@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <D1271A93.63D%kerry.lynn@one.verizon.com> <5501AB6C.5080106@viagenie.ca>
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.43.215]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnssd/KzNcDkZ9YZxiiNkXzOumx9t015Y>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:39:53 -0700
Cc: "draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements.all@ietf.org>, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "dnssd-chairs@ietf.org" <dnssd-chairs@ietf.org>, "Lynn, Kerry E" <kerry.lynn@verizon.com>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] Further IPR disclosures on draft-ietf-dnssd-requirements-05 ?
X-BeenThere: dnssd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <dnssd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnssd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnssd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd>, <mailto:dnssd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 15:57:56 -0000

On Mar 12, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> wrote:
> my take too. Not sure there is any IPR that could be claimed on this document. But, I guess it is safer and appropriate for our process to double check. I guess we are now just waiting for Stuart to confirm.

IPR can be claimed on _any_ document by submitting an IPR disclosure.   We (the IETF) do not judge the validity of IPR disclosures--we simply track them and decide whether they affect our willingness to publish a document.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email