IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Doh] Associating a DoH server with a resolver

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 29 October 2018 12:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: doh@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8BFB130EDF for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 05:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PcXZwQ0FSRHa for <doh@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 05:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe31.google.com (mail-vs1-xe31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2659130EDA for <doh@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 05:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe31.google.com with SMTP id j124so1803317vsd.4 for <doh@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 05:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=eVe4pWIy8ySIwc9jQMjjigiNS2P+/aq6CN3F/i8nxA4=; b=m7xhRSk+9l8watGbdnybPZvM4SCziBoaQAV5MCj9OyjDnma+fs5MTmKofM4l0ryrZs 5t7OZiZda6QDR6Wt2S75UY2GQpKrV/qaoO6jaz6y71XqadNy01ySuf2KoRh1SCoK00Ne fz/eHXXRxaJ5cqrS0Ys28j+Sdiw3P1akhOfqLdtXNGbvYJPZiptrO2eOmUswKU5gu7mP pecTINR66BxsG6AdSnZf2XjWGnxJOJa8ANpsHTjNC7H+tSwr9gDnhujXKDdd7TAx873h 2BECJHW3Ql8GOHMZ2mU5vD9+kuluJRPR7ID3ck7rNEPPEcCL9R5WaUEmH209PST1yCdh KL5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=eVe4pWIy8ySIwc9jQMjjigiNS2P+/aq6CN3F/i8nxA4=; b=GdqDYVWvQBAWDm5DbbxG31ybHoOQCTDfvMO0ajzoevPwcyoz3qTtaIbALlEza0M4T5 S4+iLJQESkK530HgmI+PSwlURDRazCJZut3FuA+ezKhGwy0G1UcXz9XI6scoF/BEmPvH PBmbm/h/ST8XqLOb+KFSvlEzONHz8O3U/m4yAKRF5sdQCKhj+SYG4ScJHw4K76m+W7DY /VomTZSs56Jdxrjf2OrU1V0cVdUOu1JryDyUmhIilwBQ91WRKM9NmrkhgT4kCRvgxNWv Xz0L5hUTZaGPFqquYnND6mEj33Omb9fMgvuYe4rKdrKtyHXEvIoQvMK6r5AwhPcmplhd 6U6w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gISkX8yMVeBIAGIcAs3ng1ZArqJ3aEUVvVVMBCpgI0AFJsGV3/z a0J5C1aaH1B9bcocp5ldSPPCwQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fWTy6FtFUrJiXqal0vo9TmmmEbdXWpZBhiry1OKx36j6JORmaIEGdozrnr9HkvtBu4ykdgCQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a67:4285:: with SMTP id p127mr3346853vsa.134.1540815489589; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 05:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.100.12] (c-73-186-137-119.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.186.137.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v127-v6sm5573016vke.46.2018.10.29.05.18.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Oct 2018 05:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <170BA2E7-48EA-411C-87C8-6F2B28BB2B8A@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_14F5D816-1D35-4FA3-AC0E-B5458F6466DD"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.1 \(3445.100.42\))
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 08:18:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CADWWn7V=rATn-__OZ1K0ugzrEguB89XTfVSz2dCWDTM=9AJ8-g@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: doh@ietf.org
To: Kenji Baheux <kenjibaheux=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <CADWWn7V=rATn-__OZ1K0ugzrEguB89XTfVSz2dCWDTM=9AJ8-g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.100.42)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/doh/fM9pbvxn5TUyoTuBj79WXGb8JkM>
Subject: Re: [Doh] Associating a DoH server with a resolver
X-BeenThere: doh@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Over HTTPS <doh.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/doh/>
List-Post: <mailto:doh@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/doh>, <mailto:doh-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 12:18:13 -0000

On Oct 29, 2018, at 5:29 AM, Kenji Baheux <kenjibaheux=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> I'm involved with Chrome's DNS over HTTPS effort. We are considering a behavior where Chrome would identify if the user's existing DNS server supports DoH, and if so, then perform an automatic upgrade (TBD: silent or with an opt in/out prompt). 

Do you just bypass DNS-over-TLS?   That's a lot easier for a home gateway to do.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email