Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check

["Burleigh, Scott C (313B)" <[e-mail]>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:dtn-
> [e-mail]] On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell
> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 8:00 AM
> To: DTN
> Subject: [dtn-interest] Document status check
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> As usual, there're a bunch of I-Ds with dtnrg in their
> name, so I'd just like to get a sense of the state-of-play
> for these. Feel free to reply to the list, or just Kevin
> and I. The full list is at [1], but the list that I think
> is relevant is below, though I may have missed something,
> esp. if the file name is odd (note that the list omits
> the drafts that are already progressing).
> 
> What I'd like is to get is a sense of whether you think
> drafts are dead or not, and if not, roughly where you think
> your draft is going, (and when).
> 
> If you think the draft should live, but no longer have
> cycles to work on it, then that's interesting too - we
> may be able to recruit some new authors.
> 
> I can start the ball rolling: I think of draft-farrell-dtnrg-km
> as a reminder that we've not done much in the way of key
> mgmt and should, but the draft wasn't ever really aimed
> at being an RFC. If someone wanted to revive or replace that,
> that'd be fine by me.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stephen.
> 
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/id/dtnrg
> 
> DTNRG non-expired:
> 
> 01 Jun 2010  	draft-irtf-dtnrg-ecos

The ECOS draft is still active, and I'd like to get it into the review mill soon.

> DTNRG expired:
> 
> 31 Mar 2009  	draft-irtf-dtnrg-dtn-uri-scheme

I thought this one had gotten resubmitted.  It's still alive, as far as I know, but not at the top of anybody's priority list.

> PERS non-expired:
> 
> 09 Jul 2010  	draft-burleigh-dtnrg-cgr

Still active.  There's a bit of research going on here, so the draft isn't yet sufficiently baked to start the review cycle.

> 10 Feb 2010  	draft-burleigh-dtnrg-ltpcl

Still alive, and not changing much at this point.  Might be mature enough to start reviewing.

Scott