Re: [dtn-interest] Document status check

[<[e-mail]>]

draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-checksum depends heavily on draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-security, so let's wait until that gets through publication before considering the checksum draft. Like bundle security, it would be experimental, I think. (The security-16 draft doesn't state intended status at top, but given the SHOULD MUST language, it must be intended as experimental.)

draft-wood-dtnrg-saratoga relies heavily on draft-wood-tsvwg-saratoga, so would really need publishing after that. It does read more as informational, but a lot of experiments from space carrying bundles over Saratoga have been done [1], so experimental is likely most appropriate. (And some of its informative references are probably really normative - the tsvwg draft, for one. Can an informative draft have normative references?)

draft-wood-dtnrg-http-dtn-delivery is intended as experimental.

These drafts are not dead, and are not expired.

[1] Oh, btw, a paper describing some of the more recent tests with Saratoga carrying bundles from space is now available:

http://personal.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/publications/index.html#globecom-transfer
Will Ivancic, Phil Paulsen, Dave Stewart, John Taylor, Scott Lynch,
Jay Heberle, James Northam, Chris Jackson and Lloyd Wood, 'Large
Large File Transfers from Space using Multiple Ground Terminals and
Delay-Tolerant Networking', refereed conference paper, IEEE Global
Communications Conference (Globecom 2010), Miami, Florida, December 2010.

Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/dtn
________________________________________
From: [e-mail] [[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell [[e-mail]]
Sent: 29 July 2010 15:59
To: DTN
Subject: [dtn-interest] Document status check

Hi all,

As usual, there're a bunch of I-Ds with dtnrg in their
name, so I'd just like to get a sense of the state-of-play
for these. Feel free to reply to the list, or just Kevin
and I. The full list is at [1], but the list that I think
is relevant is below, though I may have missed something,
esp. if the file name is odd (note that the list omits
the drafts that are already progressing).

What I'd like is to get is a sense of whether you think
drafts are dead or not, and if not, roughly where you think
your draft is going, (and when).

If you think the draft should live, but no longer have
cycles to work on it, then that's interesting too - we
may be able to recruit some new authors.

I can start the ball rolling: I think of draft-farrell-dtnrg-km
as a reminder that we've not done much in the way of key
mgmt and should, but the draft wasn't ever really aimed
at being an RFC. If someone wanted to revive or replace that,
that'd be fine by me.

Thanks,
Stephen.

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/id/dtnrg

DTNRG non-expired:

28 Apr 2010     draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-age-block
01 Jun 2010     draft-irtf-dtnrg-ecos
17 May 2010     draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-previous-hop-block
08 May 2010     draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-checksum
08 Mar 2010     draft-irtf-dtnrg-ipnd

DTNRG expired:

05 Oct 2009     draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-retrans-block
12 Aug 2009     draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-divert
12 Aug 2009     draft-irtf-dtnrg-bundle-encapsulation
31 Mar 2009     draft-irtf-dtnrg-dtn-uri-scheme
09 Mar 2009     draft-irtf-dtnrg-sec-overview
19 Nov 2008     draft-irtf-dtnrg-udp-clayer
03 Nov 2008     draft-irtf-dtnrg-tcp-clayer

PERS non-expired:

09 Jul 2010     draft-burleigh-dtnrg-cgr
08 May 2010     draft-wood-dtnrg-saratoga
08 May 2010     draft-wood-dtnrg-http-dtn-delivery
28 Feb 2010     draft-fall-dtnrg-schl
27 Feb 2010     draft-mcmahon-dtnrg-dtn-edp
10 Feb 2010     draft-burleigh-dtnrg-ltpcl
09 Feb 2010     draft-irtf-dtnrg-ding-network-management

PERS expired:

26 Oct 2009     draft-davies-dtnrg-uri-find
12 Aug 2009     draft-symington-dtnrg-bundle-multicast-custodial
06 Jun 2009     draft-ivancic-dtnrg-network-management-reqs
22 May 2009     draft-pbasu-dtnrg-naming
19 Jun 2007     draft-farrell-dtnrg-km