IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP

Marc Linsner <mlinsner@cisco.com> Wed, 29 April 2009 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <mlinsner@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBB93A6E5C for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.419
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.180, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Yw4nt-XbPYv for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562F23A67EC for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.40,267,1238976000"; d="scan'208";a="178649532"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Apr 2009 18:59:40 +0000
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n3TIxeF2003499 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:59:40 -0700
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3TIxeAd011481 for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:59:40 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:59:40 -0400
Received: from [10.116.195.115] ([10.116.195.115]) by xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:59:40 -0400
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:59:39 -0400
From: Marc Linsner <mlinsner@cisco.com>
To: ECRIT <ecrit@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C61E1BDB.14A03%mlinsner@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP
Thread-Index: AcnI/KV1Vq5BmQ5zKEWG4JmZqlEkpQ==
In-Reply-To: <A8FAF0F7-2E1E-4DC6-9FBB-FC8DCC5214F4@cs.columbia.edu>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Apr 2009 18:59:40.0216 (UTC) FILETIME=[A62EAB80:01C9C8FC]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=320; t=1241031580; x=1241895580; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=mlinsner@cisco.com; z=From:=20Marc=20Linsner=20<mlinsner@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[Ecrit]=20PhoneBCP |Sender:=20; bh=sA2mtdkUU1o/wAgIYnIE56ETnZRHAOqbP51haLCclQ4=; b=hLi5mjxS0m3xOwaMWeP8/0kFpO3LaKaHdMFt/QUMHte+nOCwUUqnlgwbmj CwR667kIidjB6nxQxtWJy/gLTaLXA8RT+feM0UE+NLvnWrddVC1fKR062wTz BLOP50dMQcFzvt3jCImZiVzN3BzyR7Uvu+s5vdUPyXs+AXu8P/A8c=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=mlinsner@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:58:19 -0000

[chair hat off]

+1

-Marc-


On 4/27/09 9:42 AM, "Henning Schulzrinne" <hgs@cs.columbia.edu> wrote:

> +1
> 
> On Apr 27, 2009, at 8:34 AM, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
> 
>> I hum against the applicability statement. I cannot see why we need
>> one.
>> 
>> 
>> Ciao
>> Hannes
>> 
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status