Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP

["Spencer Dawkins" <[e-mail]>]

I had hoped to stay quiet in this thread, and this is NOT a late hum, either 
for or against, but

> The statement added in -09 is a compromise; even the most fervent argument 
> against it comes down to "it isn't needed".  Given the choice between a 
> compromise statement that clearly does no harm, and, depending on one's 
> viewpoint is either vitally needed or redundant, it seem clear that we 
> should progress the document with the text in it.

I'm having a difficult time thinking of "clearly does no harm" as sufficient 
justification for including text in a document that's still tagged as a 
BCP...

:-(

Thanks,

Spencer