Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP
"Winterbottom, James" <James.Winterbottom@andrew.com> Fri, 15 May 2009 05:07 UTC
Return-Path: <James.Winterbottom@andrew.com>
X-Original-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ecrit@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3B83A701F for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2009 22:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.245
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.245 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GO3ohDo8C4Kw for <ecrit@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2009 22:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from andrew.com (smtp3.andrew.com [198.135.207.235]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309503A6AFA for <ecrit@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 May 2009 22:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-SEF-Processed: 5_0_0_910__2009_05_15_00_30_29
X-SEF-16EBA1E9-99E8-4E1D-A1CA-4971F5510AF: 1
Received: from acdcexbh1.andrew.com [10.86.20.91] by smtp3.andrew.com - SurfControl E-mail Filter (5.2.1); Fri, 15 May 2009 00:30:29 -0500
Received: from AHQEX1.andrew.com ([10.86.20.21]) by acdcexbh1.andrew.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 15 May 2009 00:09:23 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 00:09:22 -0500
Message-ID: <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF105C4ED74@AHQEX1.andrew.com>
In-Reply-To: <p06240609c632a3859181@[192.168.99.14]>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP
Thread-Index: AcnVGQJJlNZ8SA94TauHL9U+qo1Z7QAAD/yQ
References: <C61F79BD.14AA4%mlinsner@cisco.com><p06240805c61fb26aa4e1@[10.0.1.197]><28B7C3AA2A7ABA4A841F11217ABE78D6759ED5FD@FRMRSSXCHMBSB3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <029001c9d49e$3bdf6ff0$b39e4fd0$@net><p06240604c6326f220721@[192.168.99.14]><039a01c9d4fd$c60e4c50$522ae4f0$@net> <p06240609c632a3859181@[192.168.99.14]>
From: "Winterbottom, James" <James.Winterbottom@andrew.com>
To: Randall Gellens <randy@qualcomm.com>, Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>, "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <drage@alcatel-lucent.com>, Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>, MarcLinsner <mlinsner@cisco.com>, ecrit@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2009 05:09:23.0612 (UTC) FILETIME=[4FC825C0:01C9D51B]
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP
X-BeenThere: ecrit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
List-Post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 05:07:52 -0000
Randy, Do you agree that when a call is made from a mobile device (IP or otherwise), that the steps of acquiring the device's location, then determining the route to the correct PSAP are necessary? 23.167 allows the device to acquire its location ahead of time from the IP can, how is this different to ECRIT? Are you saying that 23.167 requires explicit wording to say that if the device is a cellphone it must not do this? Perhaps the rules in phone BCP surrounding wireless devices needing to poll periodically is not desired behaviour. Perhaps the correct behaviour is do it when you first connect, do it at call time, do it if you change networks because your LIS will have changed. In each of these cases the device will need to be active anyway, so the argument of consuming more battery because the device has to move out of idle mode is totally moot. Brian, do you take exception to my proposed change? It still provides a fallback option if the attempt fails at call time, and it still allows the device to route with the best data possible if everything is working okay. Cheers James -----Original Message----- From: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Randall Gellens Sent: Friday, 15 May 2009 2:47 PM To: Brian Rosen; 'DRAGE, Keith (Keith)'; 'Ted Hardie'; 'MarcLinsner'; ecrit@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP At 9:37 PM -0400 5/14/09, Brian Rosen wrote: > Please cite an instance. > > We do not believe that the requirement for the endpoint to query the LIS or > the LoST server is onerous on any cellular network. In the scheme of things > that IP based devices (we are talking about IP connected devices, not > current GSM/CDMA systems) are expected to do, a HELD and LoST query is very > modest in bandwidth, code size and compute power. The instructions are for devices to determine their location when powered on and frequently thereafter, and do LoST queries afterwards. This may be fine for many devices, but not for cellphones. _______________________________________________ Ecrit mailing list Ecrit@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of this email is prohibited. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [mf2]
- [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Marc Linsner
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Richard Barnes
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Gabor.Bajko
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Stark, Barbara
- [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Marc Linsner
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Ted Hardie
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Richard Barnes
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Richard Barnes
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Marc Linsner
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Richard Barnes
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Edge, Stephen
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Dawson, Martin
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Stark, Barbara
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Edge, Stephen
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Richard Barnes
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Richard Barnes
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Richard Barnes
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Richard Barnes
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Gabor.Bajko
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Ray.Bellis
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Marc Linsner
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Marc Linsner
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Byron Smith
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP James M. Polk
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Edge, Stephen
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Edge, Stephen
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Edge, Stephen
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Edge, Stephen
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Karl Heinz Wolf
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Edge, Stephen
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Marc Linsner
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Edge, Stephen
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Dawson, Martin
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Ted Hardie
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Marc Linsner
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Ted Hardie
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Edge, Stephen
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Edge, Stephen
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Elwell, John
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Roger Marshall
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Roger Marshall
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP -- are we there yet? Stark, Barbara
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Dawson, Martin
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Edge, Stephen
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Edge, Stephen
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Brian Rosen
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP James M. Polk
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Randall Gellens
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Dawson, Martin
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Dawson, Martin
- Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP Brian Rosen