IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 11 June 2019 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CE1120350 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U-Z6_qMZ1aGO for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEADD12016A for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3916; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1560271466; x=1561481066; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=L/DXS1tf9cZ8sAZtFBNrdXr5nomm+WEYq/Y3AYMrJUg=; b=AuNOljVfUvqruVXcLAwXjJjQ/nX79Kbe8gxHlJwxsdCdKup9WZLC+7Pv qAzqzbHNKfVfNGZOGkLea22oya35xHQKQvrmzjK8NdKaF054d2iAab9AA BUZD44lnhGpah8XxnT26RIY09rWK5Gs7CywrV6oHpeeysWx/QcwDAPwRo 8=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AUAADL2f9c/xbLJq1mGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBVAIBAQEBCwGBDoI+MiiEFYh7jAWSYId8AgcBAQEJAwEBLwEBhEACgyE3Bg4BAwEBBAEBAgEEbSiFSgEBAQMBI1YFCwsEFCoCAlcGE4MiAYF7D6lzgTGFR4RfEIE0AYFPiiSBf4ERJx+CTD6HTjKCJgSUDpUjCYISghuBBpAkG40CiiCgToMHAgQGBQIVgWUigVgzGggbFWUBgkE+kBY9AzCQZAEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,362,1557187200"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="12981768"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 11 Jun 2019 16:44:23 +0000
Received: from [10.61.194.73] ([10.61.194.73]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x5BGiMNI012086 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:44:23 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <4FF5A2A6-FC52-4C90-9E25-A4A5FDEA4CFA@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E3D1BDBB-A71D-4BC4-9770-DAA1445A8169"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 18:44:22 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNpCbkXU69X6PCfJ9q8cG-RA+mPHzWu=ga-Yq_0nMV_-+w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190525144314.0e72bb68@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190601204707.0bf89070@elandnews.com> <D58B591C-9140-4273-AA11-59E2EBD101FE@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190611033500.0c619e48@elandnews.com> <065101d52047$d35ea620$7a1bf260$@olddog.co.uk> <CABcZeBOX3PURx57jE1poyBt-VxdbVbcFp-E+eocPMH6fsBq6qw@mail.gmail.com> <1AE7F6A0-F278-42A5-9E55-4DA94A38CB01@cisco.com> <CABcZeBMbGOA09rRVuq2WK6SJ-pK8hAjxgMz5EaBm5-h9RGLk3g@mail.gmail.com> <066801d52053$650ea290$2f2be7b0$@olddog.co.uk> <CABcZeBMzca2JGBMtuURnHp4UomSbkwmLUmaW2OEeMTZF-Wfw3w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOdDvNpCbkXU69X6PCfJ9q8cG-RA+mPHzWu=ga-Yq_0nMV_-+w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.194.73, [10.61.194.73]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/C7Un6icHfrmeuRYlCbyn9qqVglQ>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:44:28 -0000


> On 11 Jun 2019, at 17:48, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> wrote:
> 
> . One is about the sweet spot of recall difficulty - number of signers, etc... I believe that's an unimportant question - leadership have short 2 year terms and its not like they possess nuclear codes.


I think this very much depends on your business.  Knowing that the standard can be dinked right up until the IESG, if someone disappears from that process, your feature scheduling goes out the window.  Possibly your release planning as well.  Now some variability has to be allowed for in this process.  Weeks, maybe even small number of months.  Large #s of months or even years is not an acceptable #.

And that would encourage people to do work elsewhere.  And so it’s harmful to this organization when someone fails to show up for an extended period of time.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email