IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sun, 26 May 2019 18:35 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7901200B8 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2019 11:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=g/d9LTK9; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=cqByC6NC
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6SxDpBJvRnaU for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2019 11:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB04120052 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2019 11:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([197.226.211.192]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x4QIZOXV007618 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 26 May 2019 11:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1558895736; x=1558982136; bh=eHttJttqrSBqpy3DFZeRQpJZ9NNai24fvv099khG7Js=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=g/d9LTK91M4XAOv78Up3J+i/8F14DBkj7UZFk9g74f1jGtiMbwJEusYqGHtlfTXYd STCwP1U0LxNMK1p1wIYNPvdz3U7K5S54Vh01dqG5hKGYr5maFNBbX+kcfks/C/wyal xYauAVW2Z0q35J/EjN+5Vihfcy9MdKhSepIArNRk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1558895736; x=1558982136; i=@elandsys.com; bh=eHttJttqrSBqpy3DFZeRQpJZ9NNai24fvv099khG7Js=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=cqByC6NCKW5VgguYISL9YJCeMQO8v/Lwqd6TIeGapfpNzMHBAD8caP6zvmI8Yopbc MJVqMV241iwBVvcAIE0HhqZrRh6T4HsFZ+yFUdzD1wl6r5/6A/MZe8EbHnezrPlDxO GO0Vk+KEoGqwd/VV3rvwRV3QGl5MuMJJmUEqfVrI=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190526113012.1262f550@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 11:35:08 -0700
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <1669AFBCC1B86369530B56FB@JcK-HP5.jck.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190525144314.0e72bb68@elandnews.com> <FDDEFD82-E276-4874-896E-490397EDA735@akamai.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190525151934.0c0099e0@elandnews.com> <7D195412-2A8E-44FC-9144-B7C48F33EE5C@cisco.com> <067001d513ad$09739f60$1c5ade20$@olddog.co.uk> <CABcZeBOEWNPETpd-cTajhd+3uzztJzGJqMKHf17h=V9NUHscww@mail.gmail.com> <1669AFBCC1B86369530B56FB@JcK-HP5.jck.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/cAVXFURUBwLR0fCe7LQ9MIvgPXU>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 18:35:40 -0000

Hi John,
At 08:29 AM 26-05-2019, John C Klensin wrote:
>And that is one of the places where we have controversy.  I
>haven't seen SM's BOF proposal yet, but, if I were writing the
>problem statement for it, it would reflect what he, I, and

The problem statement is at 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/ftKFY8H0epI1zUxMeHr_B_Vll7c

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email