IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 04 June 2019 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719B61205D9 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 12:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=V2HblGad; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=JymFnpxR
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MxvsugwFVV0l for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 12:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5FB12013B for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 12:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([197.226.54.167]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x54JnIhP016734 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 12:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1559677771; x=1559764171; bh=qCyQRMZAly2FtvYxKjRl0Db8JCEBDb0bTSTV+XDrvn0=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=V2HblGadZhNE+Lu8XN1sQS+sEWFY40BOIsaUGK5Y2SQaelLMZRiW8VX1APIFrQqoC xGMOx0DmbmcLXoRQidulrIcZKQmBcShDud3TNyjekAwoGSLQOuUG/1CTU3qbP8VOiz HsXZCTrBZv9PTNwoL19zqMLoo5Rq5S73ue9LMYuI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1559677771; x=1559764171; i=@elandsys.com; bh=qCyQRMZAly2FtvYxKjRl0Db8JCEBDb0bTSTV+XDrvn0=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=JymFnpxRB7ZF8se31SN9uQczu0uJBoxwXgiNaYs4EUoO2DIFuM+DgjTlYYeHcq2ui DzJzgvrnoTEG2l+8JhjH6BTf/0aXpAe/xSE5Nalz7NfWa4fk5kUaUvbBdrVMy9Ud1k xjFhZNiMX3nkoI5130BLpvrKV40I8lCpKJhz+3Y0=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190604124032.0c2f0ca0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 12:49:01 -0700
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <D58B591C-9140-4273-AA11-59E2EBD101FE@gmail.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190525144314.0e72bb68@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190601204707.0bf89070@elandnews.com> <D58B591C-9140-4273-AA11-59E2EBD101FE@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/nP-Ds6bhQqmEjdvrlSrdWng2KAY>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 19:49:42 -0000

Hi Suresh,
At 08:22 PM 03-06-2019, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
>Also, mention whether you would like this to be a working group 
>forming BoF or not. One other suggestion I would make is to put the 
>virtual BoF request into

Thank you for responding.

The advice from the IETF Chair was to have a BOF to process the 
draft.  I approached the Area Directors, as suggested by the IETF 
Chair, about the BOF.  Could Warren, Alexey or you provide some 
expert advice on whether a working group forming BoF should be requested?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email