IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

"Eliot Lear (elear)" <elear@cisco.com> Sun, 26 May 2019 09:58 UTC

Return-Path: <elear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F15120124 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2019 02:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=jrWCgqLT; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=SyyZNPHn
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vGfzregPvMd3 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2019 02:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D33E3120052 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2019 02:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2222; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1558864723; x=1560074323; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=zljShsEYtHGZYY1hswOEZZnui0Xo39H1qTRmLo1RXXI=; b=jrWCgqLTraH0R8/+MCB/ElWVzxCZl168V/sob15VAyLFaG25f5EXdHJc STFqIskvQYEivakTxkrx5DIkNkr+shQDM9O17lYmh8NINu2QXZ6r8lcP3 y+mw7jd+Y0aq6SLDhEhSCb0ocg6RSYoDzx+aOyuQMLSCES3hpadJEU/rH k=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:kFtZAR0nZzkHKpc1smDT+zVfbzU7u7jyIg8e44YmjLQLaKm44pD+JxGPt+51ggrPWoPWo7JfhuzavrqoeFRI4I3J8RVgOIdJSwdDjMwXmwI6B8vQBEn2JeTCZC0hF8MEX1hgrDm2
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AZAACzYupc/5RdJa1lGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUwMBAQEBCwGBPVADaVUgBAsohBODRwOOeIIyJZcrgS6BJANUCQEBAQwBARgLCgIBAYN6RgIXgigjNgcOAQMBAQQBAQIBBG0cDIVKAQEBAQIBAQEQEREMAQEsCwEECwIBCBgCAiYCAgIlCxUQAgQOBSKDAAGBagMODwECDJtJAoE4iF9xgS+CeQEBBYJHgjIYgg8DBoEMKAGLUheBQD+BOAwTgkw+gmEBAYRrMoImjgyaSwkCgg2TFRuCH4ZmjUSOFpRQAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFWCSiBV3AVOyoBgkGCD4NwhRSFP3KBKY1LAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,514,1549929600"; d="scan'208";a="562754088"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 26 May 2019 09:58:41 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com (xch-rcd-009.cisco.com [173.37.102.19]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x4Q9wgO5028030 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 26 May 2019 09:58:42 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com (173.37.102.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Sun, 26 May 2019 04:58:41 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Sun, 26 May 2019 05:58:40 -0400
Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 26 May 2019 04:58:40 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=zljShsEYtHGZYY1hswOEZZnui0Xo39H1qTRmLo1RXXI=; b=SyyZNPHnQSRRLhjW8RwmM77gVyR/ADfoPWOYAOf7p4bzGX/2ilvAkgY+23QA5cQc8y703yRplV6s96kVtXJLqfj+Pn73rX4IyumdCcFajYp2hDkeZzbrU/faRwrEdyEFkZO6Kj3QnllbMvQgiYB/PXHSfQ4Vnvxk1Mg0uZYeUbk=
Received: from BYAPR11MB3814.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.239.88) by BYAPR11MB3526.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.177.227.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1922.20; Sun, 26 May 2019 09:58:38 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB3814.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b511:9caf:cfde:ef56]) by BYAPR11MB3814.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b511:9caf:cfde:ef56%7]) with mapi id 15.20.1922.021; Sun, 26 May 2019 09:58:38 +0000
From: "Eliot Lear (elear)" <elear@cisco.com>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
CC: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "eligibility-discuss@ietf.org" <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
Thread-Index: AQHVE0PSiT0UuhN9Ik6M1FKDOJkuh6Z8ZVeAgAAIH4CAAL8wSA==
Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 09:58:38 +0000
Message-ID: <7D195412-2A8E-44FC-9144-B7C48F33EE5C@cisco.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190525144314.0e72bb68@elandnews.com> <FDDEFD82-E276-4874-896E-490397EDA735@akamai.com>, <6.2.5.6.2.20190525151934.0c0099e0@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20190525151934.0c0099e0@elandnews.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=elear@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2a02:aa15:4101:2a80:1c5d:a662:5c46:80f0]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c710f1c2-a1a4-4b0f-a007-08d6e1c0b9ab
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR11MB3526;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB3526:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB35263513C46338A37C8B9948BF1C0@BYAPR11MB3526.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0049B3F387
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(346002)(366004)(376002)(199004)(189003)(76116006)(91956017)(478600001)(66556008)(66946007)(73956011)(64756008)(66476007)(66446008)(82746002)(966005)(6116002)(14454004)(305945005)(6486002)(6512007)(6306002)(6436002)(102836004)(68736007)(229853002)(33656002)(2906002)(7736002)(5660300002)(316002)(4326008)(476003)(76176011)(71190400001)(186003)(2616005)(8676002)(81156014)(6246003)(54906003)(71200400001)(8936002)(86362001)(83716004)(36756003)(486006)(25786009)(46003)(81166006)(99286004)(14444005)(256004)(53936002)(53546011)(11346002)(6506007)(446003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR11MB3526; H:BYAPR11MB3814.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: MSQp22a2pfrPtolCp81XV7pcxnY+XLOqLn2v5Z39jcNOta6VkL7i5nqFRzQQ8V6kIGeI+xIuE+uYJCZQ6HVBYuey5254lQv/Cyq4Ren6ec8jj4BI/g2+FzOjMePLpOCcm59vmmNBmWtT89Vsax4c/pO5N34cYX9ZMiAZ/OmafCTWzi8NV3ECi/9v+MJUXF4XBt1dJrLphPIUktoi7V8QIiyls3sNTu3ArZJw/FYjtP7jYGkD4EMLE6i4o/cfOU9wqbUwIm0gRkdfYPaGfXpAxh2zaUFu2o5B0vBrZ9XukpwwLCJRvBBbp8U116K+Jtlq/Iqy/ovPBLe3gplixjXE2NBlZt0gbnxfRzyX+VTc+bNCNbBjND888NfFYjbcZ/QsDdphzXONxiSIKje/omRFF+ZFEVpZrXIZYdbOcDdMZ2g=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c710f1c2-a1a4-4b0f-a007-08d6e1c0b9ab
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 May 2019 09:58:38.3107 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: elear@cisco.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB3526
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.19, xch-rcd-009.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/gdyEdlJmr7ZwtvWAlAp8TqICDk0>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 09:58:46 -0000

I like the idea of a BoF on this topic. Were we to task the traditional questions to form a WG, I’m pretty confident that they would all (eventually) be answered in the affirmative.

That doesn’t mean, SM, however, that I would agree that your draft is the correct starting point.  EKR’s draft covers many of my concerns, and from an incremental standpoint that is where I would prefer to start. Not that remote participation isn’t an important issue, but rather we have clear examples of where his draft could have helped, it is well scoped, and probably not THAT controversial. 

Eliot

> On May 26, 2019, at 00:36, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Rich,
> At 03:05 PM 25-05-2019, Salz, Rich wrote:
>>       The current description of the process for handling recalls of
>>       NomCom-appointed roles is described in RFC 7437 and is being updated in
>>       draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis.  ...
>> 
>> 
>> So why is your draft not appropriate to be discussed as part of the 7437bis document?
> 
> If I am not mistaken, the Responsible Area Director for IASA2 determined that drafts which go beyond cosmetic updates are out of scope for that working group.
> 
>> If your draft becomes an RFC at some point, do you expect it to say "updates 7437bis" ?
> 
> Please see the first page of the draft.  It has an "Updates: 7437 (if approved)".  It is expected to update 7437bis if there is approval for that.
> 
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
> 
> -- 
> Eligibility-discuss mailing list
> Eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email