Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 11 June 2019 10:47 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687691200C7 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 03:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=CnVEwDPP; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=dn2zWGEz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wFN1qbZycopR for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 03:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9DD120140 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 03:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([197.227.86.213]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x5BAknlI019677 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 03:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1560250025; x=1560336425; bh=dWei1n9g7e0JJRBmaxdvzuDcQam7Ye8uxsrBP5dzEDs=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=CnVEwDPPlzMtIGBScee6192ibCWIsW7G58EEg+6DPNO5v91kSk2FYxms/49qUP8gY u2wUlsevO/JMJ8Kek/jVRu+n2M8u0jwoSHpjQ4xjE8jY+TIoaWPwd+S/qcrOCdPTbz QVzqSMia/oYPaP/8BysUlMhAnSERr2TVDRnBUFpY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1560250025; x=1560336425; i=@elandsys.com; bh=dWei1n9g7e0JJRBmaxdvzuDcQam7Ye8uxsrBP5dzEDs=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=dn2zWGEzf2ccCQd8sisfvAXFHamgK/OxAxAADmiE+vtuKEq+xR+c7W1zBhumUE1hJ tOsB48uvDdlAkhrOsDtbx3agte7H7hKJunx5B3CbVK+hxU38sM1GIPy+mBpM1vohm3 mR00zEjrzKd6FU6eV41oljTwt33/zO5IRfTZrfEE=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20190611033500.0c619e48@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 03:45:20 -0700
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <D58B591C-9140-4273-AA11-59E2EBD101FE@gmail.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190525144314.0e72bb68@elandnews.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190601204707.0bf89070@elandnews.com> <D58B591C-9140-4273-AA11-59E2EBD101FE@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/nvuFy42SRQEU-MCl-VbLBxtsDfg>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Virtual BoF for draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:47:14 -0000

Hi Suresh,

Please see a revised version of the BOF proposal to address your comments:

Problem statement

      The current description of the process for initiating petitions 
for recalls
      for NomCom-appointed roles is described in RFC 7437 and is 
being updated in
      draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc7437bis.  The scope of this work addresses only three
      specific issues with the petition process; other parts of the 
recall model
      and other ways of removing Nomcom-appointees are explicitly out of scope.

      The three issues are:

      - Ineligibility of remote participants to seek redress through the
        recall process;

      - Reducing the number of signatories for a recall petition;

      - Ineligibility of IAB and IESG Members and other Nomcom
        Appointees to sign a recall petition.

The purpose of the BOF is to examine the above-mentioned issues and determine,
for each, whether it is sufficient interest and importance. 
draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
is a possible starting point for the effort.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy