Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom chair selection?

Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com> Wed, 09 September 2020 21:53 UTC

Return-Path: <msj@nthpermutation.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7588D3A0F43 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 14:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.846
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.846 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.948, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7pfpDEkqxp7t for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 14:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A5F03A0F3F for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 14:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com with SMTP id q10so2393713qvs.1 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nthpermutation-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=iu1OOcOvMu+BHhYTI1HF00Au4Ha15j2V6IjjJpXDh9c=; b=bJynnf9MG37hAVE+Pnagf1XCWkpPYLbJt/1R5IPZGoS5BjdHutGYUYgwxBAw+Et3nX tmTTS1BuugHuBCT2MfgMemYkJBqwGTvNzjxdG3P45guAW4DiHipZw/ZM5SBg3wgStIUz MlJUaLnbpyC9vQd6W4KQUtUNK4eRsLtiwpeAWYC3u1cOdbEoy8Ha7RpmTpFJrDO60bMp ONvDJTmwyA/u0RqXDioeLr9AubDButUVFH2kXhU/0vXevGtxrfQfURBXnluamwVP6u/j wRy86zdLZ3QA6equdrgkKSwt7eS0NCacUHZ16gmGM4mhLbiM1au5sEVcp0XAD3OCiqyV Aglg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=iu1OOcOvMu+BHhYTI1HF00Au4Ha15j2V6IjjJpXDh9c=; b=iNwd5m6mk4BzhdAUIM1UGM42wxzpYaChamWkmH4laR1a5i2KGyTvPqLNw8bRd05daq Cs8VPxm1/Mcdj5lhFAXQRoPAJdAA3+c1/Su9pYloYIqDl99B5j6JVBf+oH2kahEQMS2m lYhmrMsr9cU5isEcJA20DK7f32j6vGPOhmIi2DJejSjcfvWmqnz87vtOlFZFVIh98T1j Lr3or9Ednif4UEMJdP/q3y1pPaZ0TbMRyx3NcGkE+sMHVP3ZQxPhveVqeI9HNmS/Hvvk l8QEvwY597W2wc5jlsiIp/Qm/YsbnZ+jHY92M0MaWpgvrONPe1CPyABENb1G0firIW70 UVVA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531MFC70LTLddkv9hF+nzhZiMoXZ+f2s4wWWppMDywht500vimq1 t4onOdCDZUjg3A4/r0S60sQdEYHKAuMP6VI0ZfU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyRclAWXAQ9aArIahtLtfZ2mDN/3xI+96v7l6YBr6/QN5WgSgwbVrUFfj8TvqmfN9wa6rNCXA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:16f:: with SMTP id y15mr5942128qvs.66.1599688436831; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.20] (pool-108-28-189-254.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [108.28.189.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x126sm3988136qkb.101.2020.09.09.14.53.56 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
To: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20200814192145.iiuoma7a3frf7mm7@crankycanuck.ca> <006801d672e1$3a7989a0$af6c9ce0$@olddog.co.uk> <20200909180148.lr6ra2kgpsp3b4js@crankycanuck.ca> <9cebc2cb-656e-23ba-3e0f-996ed97de825@nthpermutation.com> <20200909212338.3opg6a55p5zjpfih@crankycanuck.ca>
From: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Message-ID: <cea7bf50-7324-7c77-8085-ad5504f2dff9@nthpermutation.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 17:53:54 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200909212338.3opg6a55p5zjpfih@crankycanuck.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/YMq-tMY6hLh1MkLm2fxb38qLe10>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] Suggestions for nomcom chair selection?
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 21:53:59 -0000

On 9/9/2020 5:23 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 04:28:49PM -0400, Michael StJohns wrote:
>>
>> Let's let the Nomcom select the next Nomcom chair, with the approval 
>> of the IAB and IESG.
>
> One complaint I have heard repeatedly is that the nomcom is already 
> overloaded.  Beating the bushes for a good candidate and deciding on 
> one this way strikes me as another pretty big burden. I am certainly 
> willing to try it, however, if people want: I would agree to appoint 
> whomever was selected that way, so that we didn't actually need to 
> make a process change to try it out.  Of course, we'd have to get a 
> nomcom to agree to add this to their plate!
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>
One of the things here is that the selection period for the chair is 
distinct from the normal work period for the Nomcom.  Say they start in 
March and finish in July for the selection of the next chair?  Or even a 
much shorter period than that  - May to June - given that there's only 
one slot being filled.

Later, Mike