[Emailcore] Re: [Last-Call] draft-ietf-emailcore-as-28 ietf last call Secdir review

John Levine <johnl@ietf.email> Fri, 08 May 2026 00:46 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: emailcore@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: emailcore@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4EFAEAEE895 for <emailcore@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 7 May 2026 17:46:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1778201200; bh=w64liBP9WykqUEA5Czl3AFoVD7Xn4XGwqja7sCHpWt4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=mHPOU5X/+6BeOauFoCEjqo6PdkoTQKTrr1T7MX8LRVoFGGo9TSpZVXi/ZJsvyA/hW 1sDbGpn3FuBeyBZhs4gxaRIaZgg3D9g+WlW6q6VKkbh16yNSB8r+6hdN6/zMtL7MTR sosmZ9UZgYELd/VxhiH4nqL8Mu/b7PkoRHjTXQxQ=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="EGFr1sCE"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ietf.email header.b="GYjPKEul"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N0HpDzPnrhWc for <emailcore@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 7 May 2026 17:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44343EAEE88C for <emailcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 May 2026 17:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 99267 invoked from network); 8 May 2026 00:46:35 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=183bf69fd326b.k2605; t=1778201185; x=1778546785; bh=w64liBP9WykqUEA5Czl3AFoVD7Xn4XGwqja7sCHpWt4=; b=EGFr1sCE0IulangUFGAnkgmFYiC45SKvWstK611RDN/VOEajq1q+t3Bt1QtW2jlPwv8e1qjqg8iWvE2pay2Dvu6a5K8TLpNtiSad6EmnUAxRuGqMRJJurShpWQ074oAhkP0HU+TREMVaoW1uL63hEEwd2HBTcBPtvcDckOY6ziI7Bj/KFUr3Za7RuChm2YzavQcsBEj+g7C0p4Cwl12ogkRwMc7xsalwFLik9yAmjyDvDcDCS8/Yghp03pMswvPgwwuSKgzsalUsEwkqyK3F+NSx2oash8UKSd/aMWx2twFHMv7BFfxx3csng2sPUCIr4f5ezvfR5CdbCzJV7yVM0Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=ietf.email; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=183bf69fd326b.k2605; bh=w64liBP9WykqUEA5Czl3AFoVD7Xn4XGwqja7sCHpWt4=; b=GYjPKEulHbadzJY2vCgQisdn+zTF2lHRqTLT5vW7qHh0/Duo4FaXUFBNLhpCOkhh8b9r53MYl+iocbberUxjk/EVucS/8hnDQE9TcRL3O+Olem8xGXBlz1YMYXiT+bMi9aff+HHs2TqGYs3mMX3O77CzN4QqE/1fvrri3KAH6zBhcE0LnHgZOmFnX5KzZItB0LT8lONcHGshn9gBfbtaUCBa5ih7SNWr8SPtYbyplsXbb6nw843cZ1sMIaBHNL12l+x29POWC5L+N+LJpvR6j608n90qE06K20kAqPTl0mAhkPc3XHIxKjEFzZEMBToWaKuqcA8tFO+LJaCu3YFvyA==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD) via TCP6; 08 May 2026 00:46:35 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id EA13710898844; Thu, 7 May 2026 20:46:34 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 07 May 2026 20:46:34 -0400
Message-Id: <20260508004634.EA13710898844@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@ietf.email>
To: emailcore@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <7278d338-d2f7-43e8-8fc5-8feab1ba7323@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
References: <CAChr6Sy4RJ66gUXR=U9GbKjEu-+7z5EFZVDtqPbtrkomPfoK_w@mail.gmail.com> <7278d338-d2f7-43e8-8fc5-8feab1ba7323@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Message-ID-Hash: IFKOCP5VD3NYOV6EFLALBGS2JC5XAMKY
X-Message-ID-Hash: IFKOCP5VD3NYOV6EFLALBGS2JC5XAMKY
X-MailFrom: johnl@iecc.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Emailcore] Re: [Last-Call] draft-ietf-emailcore-as-28 ietf last call Secdir review
List-Id: EMAILCORE proposed working group list <emailcore.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emailcore/b0wBxo5BlAiJApxR7H_Bgzp6Tw4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emailcore>
List-Help: <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:emailcore-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:emailcore@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:emailcore-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:emailcore-leave@ietf.org>

It appears that Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> said:
>Hello Rob, others,
>
>On 2026-05-08 06:19, Rob Sayre wrote:
>
>> Because you don't understand that the large ones will want to accept
>> cleartext email while narrower installations will not.
>
>There is an important word missing here: *some* narrower installations 
>will not want to accept clear text. But even with that word added, we 
>don't know how many. If you have any actual data, please provide it.

I have done a lot of surveys of mail systems and I do not ever recall
seeing one that did not accept clear text.  Postfix offers the option
to reject clear text, but it is my strong impression that nobody other
than perhaps a few hobbyists use it.

As I may have said once or twice, if we are serious about interoperation
and the "running code" part of standards, cleartext mail is mandatory.
That's why every mail software package and every real mail system
supports it.*

R's,
John

* - an AI hacked version of Postfix doesn't count