Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT)
"A.M.Rutkowski" <amr@netmagic.com> Fri, 23 February 2001 02:47 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id VAA04994 for <enum-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:47:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA00788; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:45:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA00691 for <enum@ns.ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:45:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from exchange.chaos.com (exchange.chaos.com [206.5.17.8]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id VAA04904 for <enum@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:44:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [206.5.17.17] by exchange.netmagic.com (NTMail 5.06.0016/NT2627.00.5ef58ba0) with ESMTP id syvkaaaa for enum@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:44:55 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.0.7.2.20010222193103.00ae1710@mail.netmagic.com>
X-Sender: amr@mail.netmagic.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.0.7 (Beta)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:44:54 -0500
To: Richard Shockey <rshockey@ix.netcom.com>, Stephane Alnet <salnet@cisco.com>, enum@ietf.org
From: "A.M.Rutkowski" <amr@netmagic.com>
Subject: Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT)
In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010222190237.02f08980@127.0.0.1>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010222183630.00b67ad0@bucket.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: enum-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
At 07:05 PM 2/22/2001, Richard Shockey wrote: >TPC.INT was a useful experiment ..nothing more. Stephane, An alternative view. TPC.INT was not only an incredibly innovative protocol and use of the Internet's distributed entrepreneurial properties by two of the Internet's most celebrated developers, it was a political statement if not movement heard around the world when it was first announced at Interop in 1994. Lycos hotbot currently gets nearly 10,000 hits in every corner of the globe for TPC.INT and its services are still relied upon by a great many people, albeit apparently not by Richard. The Phone Company's fax bypass and remote paging services were a statement to the ITU and it's highly structured PTO communities, that a set of autonomous entities could independently organize themselves to provide telco services. Needless to say, it caused considerable consternation in some quarters that led to a subsequent largely ITU Secretariat let effort to tuck some kind of formal ITU designated e164 zone under INT. TPC.INT's leadership also inspired a broadbased IP Telephony movement - the results of which we see today. --tony _______________________________________________ enum mailing list enum@ietf.org http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
- [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Stephane Alnet
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) A.M.Rutkowski
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) David R. Conrad
- RE: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Shaw, Robert
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) A.M.Rutkowski
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) A.M.Rutkowski
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Marshall T. Rose
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Randy Bush
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Marshall T. Rose
- RE: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Shaw, Robert
- RE: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Bill Manning
- RE: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) BARNOLE Valerie FTRD/DAC/ISS
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine