Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT)

"Marshall T. Rose" <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us> Fri, 23 February 2001 17:06 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id MAA09089 for <enum-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:06:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA19877; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:50:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA19846 for <enum@ns.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:50:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dbc.mtview.ca.us (ppp-63-207-83-130.ded.pacbell.net [63.207.83.130]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id LAA08468 for <enum@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:50:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from FATORA (ppp-63-207-83-135.ded.pacbell.net [63.207.83.135]) by dbc.mtview.ca.us (8.11.0+3.3W/8.11.0) with SMTP id f1NGYM327776; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:34:22 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <029801c09db8$b55b3290$8753cf3f@FATORA>
From: "Marshall T. Rose" <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: "A.M.Rutkowski" <amr@netmagic.com>, Stephane Alnet <salnet@cisco.com>, enum@ietf.org, Richard Shockey <rshockey@ix.netcom.com>
References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010222190237.02f08980@127.0.0.1><4.3.2.7.2.20010222183630.00b67ad0@bucket.cisco.com><5.0.2.1.2.20010222220257.02e9f6e0@127.0.0.1><024501c09db4$64530390$8753cf3f@FATORA> <E14WLJd-0009p3-00@rip.psg.com>
Subject: Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT)
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:50:20 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: enum-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> it's simple.  tony works for nsi.  nsi would like to monopolize as much of
> registration in the enum space as possible because they think there is a
LOT
> of money to be made, just as they have with com, net, and org.  so any
fud,
> sociopathology, etc. that tony can spread to disrupt the working of this
wg
> is to his direct business benefit.  make sense?

here's my context: i'm not on the enum list. looks like a fine project, but
it's not on my scope.

so i get this message, mid-thread, about tpc.int. and i'm like "ancient
history, who cares?"

so, irregardless of commercial interests, what possible impact can a
discussion of tpc.int have on the enum working group, other than having
people spend their time reading and writing e-mails. why not just ignore the
thread and move on?

/mtr



_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum@ietf.org
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum