Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT)

> pardonez-moi, but unless we're having a discussion about prior art and the
> ability for anyone to patent enum like stuff, i don't understand the
> relevance of this thread to the enum mailing list.

it's simple.  tony works for nsi.  nsi would like to monopolize as much of
registration in the enum space as possible because they think there is a LOT
of money to be made, just as they have with com, net, and org.  so any fud,
sociopathology, etc. that tony can spread to disrupt the working of this wg
is to his direct business benefit.  make sense?

randy

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum@ietf.org
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum