RE: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT)

"A.M. Rutkowski" <amr@netmagic.com> Fri, 23 February 2001 18:11 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id NAA12569 for <enum-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:11:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA21538; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:56:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA21508 for <enum@ns.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:56:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from exchange.chaos.com (exchange.chaos.com [206.5.17.8]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id MAA11638 for <enum@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:56:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [216.168.250.52] by exchange.netmagic.com (NTMail 5.06.0016/NT2627.00.5ef58ba0) with ESMTP id qqwkaaaa for enum@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:56:20 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.0.7.2.20010223124113.02930930@mail.netmagic.com>
X-Sender: amr@mail.netmagic.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.0.7 (Beta)
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:56:18 -0500
To: "Shaw, Robert" <Robert.Shaw@itu.int>, Stephane Alnet <salnet@cisco.com>, enum@ietf.org
From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <amr@netmagic.com>
Subject: RE: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT)
In-Reply-To: <B796A386E6C1D411B6FD00508B959DFE4D5D33@mailsrv4.itu.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_97575666==_.ALT"
Sender: enum-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org

Hi Bob,

>Let me just say it bluntly. The premise is false and so
>is the conclusion (like other ITU stories you have

This is not an ad hominem debate.

Most of this has long been a matter of public record on
your own site and in the ITU records.  People can read
and develop their own opinions.

http://www.itu.int/net/int/

http://www.wia.org/ITU/c99_51_long.htm

http://www.itu.int/wtpf/sgreport/finalreport31Jan.htm


--tony