Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT)
"A.M. Rutkowski" <amr@netmagic.com> Fri, 23 February 2001 17:04 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id MAA09007 for <enum-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 12:04:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA19579; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:40:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA19548 for <enum@ns.ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:40:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from exchange.chaos.com (exchange.chaos.com [206.5.17.8]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id LAA08221 for <enum@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:40:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [216.168.250.52] by exchange.netmagic.com (NTMail 5.06.0016/NT2627.00.5ef58ba0) with ESMTP id glwkaaaa for enum@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:40:25 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.0.7.2.20010223113459.00aebcb0@mail.netmagic.com>
X-Sender: amr@mail.netmagic.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.0.7 (Beta)
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:40:24 -0500
To: "Marshall T. Rose" <mrose+mtr.netnews@dbc.mtview.ca.us>, Stephane Alnet <salnet@cisco.com>, enum@ietf.org
From: "A.M. Rutkowski" <amr@netmagic.com>
Subject: Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT)
In-Reply-To: <024501c09db4$64530390$8753cf3f@FATORA>
References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010222190237.02f08980@127.0.0.1> <4.3.2.7.2.20010222183630.00b67ad0@bucket.cisco.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20010222220257.02e9f6e0@127.0.0.1>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_93021087==_.ALT"
Sender: enum-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
At 11:19 AM 2/23/2001, Marshall T. Rose wrote: >pardonez-moi, but unless we're having a discussion about prior art and the >ability for anyone to patent enum like stuff, i don't understand the >relevance of this thread to the enum mailing list. Hi Marshall, Prior art, pioneering history, and why there as an initial focus on the INT domain that remains alive at the ITU and the French Autorité de régulation des télécommunications. c'est toutes --tony
- [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Stephane Alnet
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) A.M.Rutkowski
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) David R. Conrad
- RE: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Shaw, Robert
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) A.M.Rutkowski
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) A.M.Rutkowski
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Marshall T. Rose
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Randy Bush
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Marshall T. Rose
- RE: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Shaw, Robert
- RE: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Bill Manning
- RE: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) BARNOLE Valerie FTRD/DAC/ISS
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Enum] RFC1530 (TPC.INT) Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine