Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-06.txt

I am fine with that.

Cheers,

Gonzalo

Ross Callon wrote:
> I proposed to the authors to put in an RFC editor's note to cover your
> comment. If all are fine with this, then we should be ready to put this
> on an IESG telechat.
> 
> Thanks, Ross
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gonzalo Camarillo [mailto:Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com] 
> Sent: 27 January 2009 04:31
> To: draft-ietf-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs@tools.ietf.org
> Cc: Ross Callon; gen-art@ietf.org; ccamp-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-06.txt
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> 
> Draft:  draft-ietf-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-06.txt
> Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
> Review Date: 27 January 2009
> 
> Summary:
> 
> This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.
> 
> 
> Comments:
> 
> The Terminology Section is not usually appended to the Abstract. It is 
> usually placed after the Introduction as a regular section.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art