[Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr-04.txt

Yep.
I am traveling, hence the delayed response.
Typed the response but only got connection now.
I will get the changes in latest by this weekend.
-- Kwok --

At 03:46 AM 10/10/2007, Fred Baker wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Thanks.
>
>Kwok, do you feel you can handle these?
>
>Fred
>
>
>On Oct 9, 2007, at 8:45 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
>>reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
>>http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
>>
>>Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
>>you may receive.
>>
>>
>>Draft: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr-04.txt
>>Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
>>Review Date: 8 October 2007
>>
>>Summary:
>>
>>This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that
>>should
>>be fixed before publication.
>>
>>
>>Comments:
>>
>>This draft is Informational and does not seem to contain any normative
>>text. If this is actually the case, Section 1.1 with its reference to
>>RFC 2119 should be removed.
>>
>>A set of acronyms are not expanded. They should be expanded on their
>>first use.
>>
>>References [1] and [2] are never used in the text.
>>
>>Abstracts should not contain references.
>>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Gonzalo
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>iD8DBQFHDINSbjEdbHIsm0MRAnorAKDtCg3B2UfO8xodGXevTd5xCnEQ3wCeLgTl
>OfAGJ7c2VeUUx4tOdSVmR5E=
>=gS72
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art