[Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr-05.txt

Hi,

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before
posting a new version of the draft.

Draft: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr-05.txt
Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
Review Date: 26 October 2006

Summary:

This draft is ready for publication as a Informational RFC.

Comments:

Revision 05 of this draft addresses my previous Gen-ART comments on 
revision 04 (see below).

Cheers,

Gonzalo

Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> 
> Draft: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr-04.txt
> Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
> Review Date: 8 October 2007
> 
> Summary:
> 
> This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should
> be fixed before publication.
> 
> 
> Comments:
> 
> This draft is Informational and does not seem to contain any normative
> text. If this is actually the case, Section 1.1 with its reference to
> RFC 2119 should be removed.
> 
> A set of acronyms are not expanded. They should be expanded on their
> first use.
> 
> References [1] and [2] are never used in the text.
> 
> Abstracts should not contain references.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art