[Gen-art] Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr-04.txt

Gonzalo:
Thank you very much for the review.
Sorry for the delay in replying, I am currently on the road out of the office.
I will make the modification to the draft as you indicated.
I may not be able to get the changes in until Friday Oct 12 or over 
the weekend.
But I will try to get them in earlier if possible.

Magnus, ADs/Chairs:
After I make the changes, should I submit a new version to "ietf-drafts" ??
Thank you very much for your guidance.
-- Kwok --

At 02:45 AM 10/9/2007, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
>reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
>http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
>
>Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
>you may receive.
>
>
>Draft: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr-04.txt
>Reviewer: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
>Review Date: 8 October 2007
>
>Summary:
>
>This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should
>be fixed before publication.
>
>
>Comments:
>
>This draft is Informational and does not seem to contain any normative
>text. If this is actually the case, Section 1.1 with its reference to
>RFC 2119 should be removed.
>
>A set of acronyms are not expanded. They should be expanded on their
>first use.
>
>References [1] and [2] are never used in the text.
>
>Abstracts should not contain references.
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>Gonzalo

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art