Re: [Gendispatch] another possibly problematic word
Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Fri, 11 September 2020 10:44 UTC
Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CE53A0E48; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 03:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=csperkins.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3D8zsrSzDiq9; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 03:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from haggis.mythic-beasts.com (haggis.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:86:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FFC93A0E37; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 03:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=csperkins.org; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=To:Date:Subject:From; bh=//PgbziIUwKqYDRytDaiY+ZPkGT3ue5OwNEE86yj/7Q=; b=ApFrzIhG/rKNZIanrrDMvstOCG hGUQnlAYNdZZkpZx0HswKfqcDtQvdi1nGe9NQ/8cVXXQrCLv0xR+0jLXfHJiIeQRU8p0e9hbu75hs tpRqYtANryKDwkJnuaj0UFwZ+hFV1poLvwpFQVcrdLXzHF/Z8mJ5XCiMNQ5sVRS+Ari3VE5RUp4nU I3x9HaMPqQYxMSpnS585UfzcKROsN73aw0h0mfJQdZWnruSta2/9P3Jl72FYAqNF6Ail+SVlmJve2 D35V40lhyRTLRdAmZXu4BUKHC6wU/jXAdBLgvfNkmiQn5hbvvvnSwYVxpYYHg/zyCpo2/7sT4U4Ge aGUMeDuQ==;
Received: from [81.187.2.149] (port=34206 helo=[192.168.0.80]) by haggis.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1kGgXs-0000aX-Ba; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:44:45 +0100
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Message-Id: <2280E614-38D7-48AE-8BF7-EB6B362B534A@csperkins.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1E0C8403-FEFE-4D5E-A1C5-4C9E742A2443"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.15\))
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:44:36 +0100
In-Reply-To: <A30E2210-DB2C-45FA-8D22-7E6B407A87EF@ietf.org>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>
To: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
References: <759A0AD6-B143-4D71-9CEC-2C94C5A87E3A@akamai.com> <7d54db54-5060-b43b-865b-411a901ba36e@cs.tcd.ie> <A30E2210-DB2C-45FA-8D22-7E6B407A87EF@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.15)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/DXEDAiY-PnNuhNRZVi8wmFr-EqQ>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] another possibly problematic word
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:44:54 -0000
This matches my understanding as someone who grew up in, and currently lives in, the UK. I’ve had people react negatively to the term. Colin > On 8 Sep 2020, at 19:24, Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote: > > I haven't lived in the UK for over 10 years but when I was there this was not archaic but was sort of regional (London and surrounding area + criminal culture such as prisons, gritty TV shows) and common parlance in that context. I was surprised when I discovered the security usage in my 20s but I’ve never considered there to be much chance of confusion between the two communities that use the word differently. > > Jay > >> On 9/09/2020, at 12:40 AM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie <mailto:stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 08/09/2020 12:38, Salz, Rich wrote: >>> This was news to me. FYI >> >> I believe it's archaic slang, that wasn't ever very common >> and perhaps only commonly used before the 1960's but that's >> just my impression from general reading and listening and >> could well vary from place to place, and time to time, the >> word being slang. >> >> I'm currently unconvinced by that one tbh. And not that >> convinced that curated lists of dodgy words is a good way >> to handle this. (*) >> >> S. >> >> (*) That may be due to also originating from a place where >> censorship was still somewhat common in my youth - in our >> case the censors were mainly interested in religion and >> maintaining their ideas of the good bits of the social >> status quo. One of their last gasps was banning "the life >> of Brian" movie;-) >> >>> >>> From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> … A >>> separate issue that we may want to consider relates to use of the >>> word/term “nonce”. In British English this term is slang for a >>> paedophile, >>> https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/nonce<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dictionary.cambridge.org_dictionary_english_nonce&d=DwMGaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=h3vPGHnErcFST8UylIdbLohcl4jQGcLXlgr6I_5jpwk&s=4NlmGbVCeTGF1CWzghVwoa1yDT9sIiWHbnji9xdIlzE&e=> <https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/nonce%3Chttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dictionary.cambridge.org_dictionary_english_nonce&d=DwMGaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=h3vPGHnErcFST8UylIdbLohcl4jQGcLXlgr6I_5jpwk&s=4NlmGbVCeTGF1CWzghVwoa1yDT9sIiWHbnji9xdIlzE&e=%3E> >>> >>> I’m not saying that we should necessarily change this, but we might >>> want to consider whether there is an alternative equivalent term that >>> could be used instead. … >>> >>> >> <0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc>-- >> Gendispatch mailing list >> Gendispatch@ietf.org <mailto:Gendispatch@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch > > -- > Jay Daley > IETF Executive Director > jay@ietf.org <mailto:jay@ietf.org> > > -- > Gendispatch mailing list > Gendispatch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch -- Colin Perkins https://csperkins.org/
- [Gendispatch] another possibly problematic word Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] another possibly problematic wo… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Gendispatch] another possibly problematic wo… John Levine
- Re: [Gendispatch] another possibly problematic wo… Bob Hinden
- Re: [Gendispatch] another possibly problematic wo… Jay Daley
- Re: [Gendispatch] another possibly problematic wo… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Gendispatch] another possibly problematic wo… Kyle Rose
- Re: [Gendispatch] another possibly problematic wo… Colin Perkins