IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gendispatch] another possibly problematic word

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 08 September 2020 11:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31093A1058 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 04:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SPOOFED_URL=0.001, SPOOFED_URL_HOST=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A1gKUT7N3flJ for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 04:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 548473A1053 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 04:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122330.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 088BbFlQ002749 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 12:38:20 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=VacdW1VLOLmucHuLcCiJY21Jq8ACZh3+U33B5B87YdU=; b=GU58feN1P3JcVUvXRJzxb9zLdAWhiPDu1VtxOEpotCDIaAq42n10D4KnFVCj70R4Njfv x5drAgWbed4qamjSsHr0D8Y7Cg9Bc6+GMvEI54PVgNHtvE1yGrgKrrULWsX9Q7bcaMNN d2Ooux5qMt4EILLYjVn+01M7og4iQOZ7ThOk9X+M2+1rn+5WrLUdqEULndKzvKwn6bvm qbEq/5MOR6iWD9VWzRJiJQsoW4ZgPWJ+cue2lL4JePtoEN4KuoLGCrv+qIiauVUc8Jnk 91apyN+r1TzgCm9ZRagPWo7d/c9lmFyeJR4/34/UlvMSMDrw/C0sy7OUA9ozikZG0dYo 4w==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint6 (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [184.51.33.61] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33cbe65n2m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:38:20 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 088Bb4bX012131 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:38:19 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com with ESMTP id 33c60x6vnu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 07:38:19 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:38:19 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:38:18 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "gendispatch@ietf.org" <gendispatch@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: another possibly problematic word
Thread-Index: AQHWhdSLz1Ej8xCJ2E6FyXQfQ64A5w==
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:38:17 +0000
Message-ID: <759A0AD6-B143-4D71-9CEC-2C94C5A87E3A@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.40.20081201
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_759A0AD6B1434D719CEC2C94C5A87E3Aakamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-08_06:2020-09-08, 2020-09-08 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009080108
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-08_06:2020-09-08, 2020-09-08 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009080108
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/cP244qdJoBrBTONaOHlcSW6KHbc>
Subject: [Gendispatch] another possibly problematic word
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:38:23 -0000

This was news to me.  FYI

From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
…
A separate issue that we may want to consider relates to use of the word/term “nonce”.  In British English this term is slang for a paedophile, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/nonce<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dictionary.cambridge.org_dictionary_english_nonce&d=DwMGaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=4LM0GbR0h9Fvx86FtsKI-w&m=h3vPGHnErcFST8UylIdbLohcl4jQGcLXlgr6I_5jpwk&s=4NlmGbVCeTGF1CWzghVwoa1yDT9sIiWHbnji9xdIlzE&e=>

I’m not saying that we should necessarily change this, but we might want to consider whether there is an alternative equivalent term that could be used instead.
…

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email