Re: [hackathon] Interop testing within hackathon network

Badma Butaev <badma@juniperlab.ru> Thu, 11 March 2021 23:15 UTC

Return-Path: <badma@juniperlab.ru>
X-Original-To: hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902463A1301; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:15:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H48zEJqvHrRb; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:15:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail4.smtp.beget.ru (mail4.smtp.beget.ru [185.78.30.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E76103A12FA; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:15:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [109.252.80.69] (port=3699 helo=[192.168.88.5]) by smtp.beget.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90.1-beget) (envelope-from <badma@juniperlab.ru>) id 1lKUWu-0003VJ-MN; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 02:15:44 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Badma Butaev <badma@juniperlab.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 02:15:43 +0300
Message-Id: <6C32DBAB-D3B2-48A8-9949-580EA0E2A3ED@juniperlab.ru>
References: <DD39C726-5A0E-4414-AF43-F08C8643F439@cisco.com>
Cc: Pierre Francois <pierre.francois@insa-lyon.fr>, Juhamatti Kuusisaari <juhamatk@gmail.com>, hackathon@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <DD39C726-5A0E-4414-AF43-F08C8643F439@cisco.com>
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18D52)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hackathon/aswhHKR9I6gqZC9km21V8URhssg>
Subject: Re: [hackathon] Interop testing within hackathon network
X-BeenThere: hackathon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion regarding past, present, and future IETF hackathons." <hackathon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hackathon>, <mailto:hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hackathon/>
List-Post: <mailto:hackathon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hackathon>, <mailto:hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 23:15:53 -0000

Hello!

Please remove me from the mailing list.

> 12 марта 2021 г., в 00:22, Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <eckelcu=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> написал(а):
> 
> Pierre,
> 
> Thanks, and yes, ultimately it is up to the project champions and the rest of the team to determine how they want to work and what tools they want to use. A goal of the hackathon is to provide an environment and tools that can be helpful.
> 
> Cheers,
> Charles
> 
> On 3/11/21, 12:52 PM, "Pierre Francois" <pierre.francois@insa-lyon.fr> wrote:
> 
>    Charles, 
> 
>    these are great initiatives, but shouldn't we simply rely on the champions to provide the env for interop testing?
> 
>    Cheers, 
> 
>    Pierre.
> 
>    ----- Mail original -----
>> De: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
>> À: "Juhamatti Kuusisaari" <juhamatk@gmail.com>om>, hackathon@ietf.org
>> Envoyé: Jeudi 11 Mars 2021 21:47:50
>> Objet: Re: [hackathon] Interop testing within hackathon network
> 
>> Hi Juhamatti,
>> 
>> Shared compute resources were made available at some previous in person
>> hackathons, but that practice stoped due to low utilization.
>> For recent online only hackathons, we have provided remote networking options,
>> as described here,
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-eckel-shmoo-ietf-hackathon-03#section-6.8
>> 
>> We ran into some complications that resulted in these services not being
>> available for IETF 110, but we intend to offer something comparable for future
>> hackathons. If so, would this work for the interop testing you have in mind?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Charles
>> 
>> On 3/11/21, 8:06 AM, "hackathon on behalf of Juhamatti Kuusisaari"
>> <hackathon-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of juhamatk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>   Hello,
>> 
>>   Just wondering how people have been doing interop testing in remote
>>   hackathons so far, what would be the best practices? For my use case
>>   the simplest thing would be to have a common server where a KVM image
>>   would be instantiated and other KVM instances or even host processes
>>   could connect to it over kernel switch. Anything like this available?
>> 
>>   Thanks,
>>   --
>>    Juhamatti
>> 
>>   _______________________________________________
>>   hackathon mailing list
>>   hackathon@ietf.org
>>   https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hackathon
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> hackathon mailing list
>> hackathon@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hackathon
> 
> _______________________________________________
> hackathon mailing list
> hackathon@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hackathon