IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 20 September 2013 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF62F21F994C; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=0.044, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Txi7NPGlil5u; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og110.obsmtp.com (exprod7og110.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C5221F9A65; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob110.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUjyT+iQ2bvGeQ48zgstiZ5AVuP5MdPec@postini.com; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:29:15 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED501B82DB; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FD4E190068; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:29:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:29:14 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1811\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE61C891.310C0%ietfdbh@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 10:30:37 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <A4DDD731-AE6F-4EC2-AC40-99CEF7BBAF8B@nominum.com>
References: <CE61C891.310C0%ietfdbh@comcast.net>
To: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1811)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Cc: "<apps-discuss@ietf.org>" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-homenet-arch.all@tools.ietf.org, "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 18:29:23 -0000

On Sep 20, 2013, at 10:20 AM, David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net> wrote:
> If the document is very clear that it is a temporary snapshot of current
> thinking for the WG, maybe publishing as an RFC could be justified, but
> I'M clear it meets the bar for RFC publication, even with the requested
> changes to title and intro.

This is not a temporary snapshot of current thinking for the WG.   It is a specification of what we think we are trying to achieve.   It is likely that some things will be removed, and some things will be made clearer, as work progresses.   But this isn't just a strand of spaghetti cast at the wall in hopes that it will stick.

If you have specific criticisms of the document, that would be very helpful.   If you think it's going in the wrong direction, please say so, and say why.   But "I am personally not convinced that publishing this is a good idea" is the opposite of a helpful comment.   If it's not ready, please say why, not just that you think so.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email