IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 19 September 2013 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA41C21F9005; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.515
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.515 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.084, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SSwO3G87mDMp; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og121.obsmtp.com (exprod7og121.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B4121F8FF8; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob121.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUjtT0A0ieR5GxvVwZkEAf2sGZ/NLzHGL@postini.com; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:43:13 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0FA1B82C3; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CFE0190068; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:43:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:43:10 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1811\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130919074156.0cd2d900@elandnews.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:43:07 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <3105F809-7E03-41D9-A634-DE32446FB19B@nominum.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130914143222.0b9590f0@elandnews.com> <C4F6B742-3784-48BA-8B97-BE3B8972DC39@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|72d902bbed65dc8b06cf46c298d30fe1p8I0CV03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|C4F6B742-3784-48BA-8B97-BE3B8972DC39@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <6.2.5.6.2.20130918225335.0d0e2478@elandnews.com> <E01ACFFF-CA8F-4280-8CE0-2CC57E6270EE@nominum.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130919074156.0cd2d900@elandnews.com>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1811)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Cc: "<apps-discuss@ietf.org>" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-homenet-arch.all@tools.ietf.org, "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 19:43:28 -0000

On Sep 19, 2013, at 1:36 PM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
> I agree that it would be good for the working group to evolve the document (see my previous comments about stabilizing the document and having a discussion about unresolved issues).  It might have been missed in my comments; what I am saying is that the working group already has the text it needs to get the work done; what's left is some rearrangement and tightening of the text to get a crisp document.

Possibly Tim got that from your comments—I didn't.   I should probably let Tim respond rather than continuing to muddy the waters.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email