IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Fri, 20 September 2013 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@mtcc.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C8421F9B85 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 08:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9vFYgJaFGm72 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 08:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtcc.com (mtcc.com [50.0.18.224]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E724C21F9A98 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 08:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from michael-thomass-macbook.local (aric.mtcc.com [50.0.18.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mtcc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r8KF8g0L017012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 08:08:42 -0700
Message-ID: <523C64F7.5080107@mtcc.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 08:08:39 -0700
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: homenet@ietf.org
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130914143222.0b9590f0@elandnews.com> <C4F6B742-3784-48BA-8B97-BE3B8972DC39@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|72d902bbed65dc8b06cf46c298d30fe1p8I0CV03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|C4F6B742-3784-48BA-8B97-BE3B8972DC39@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <6.2.5.6.2.20130918225335.0d0e2478@elandnews.com> <E01ACFFF-CA8F-4280-8CE0-2CC57E6270EE@nominum.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130919074156.0cd2d900@elandnews.com> <3105F809-7E03-41D9-A634-DE32446FB19B@nominum.com> <523B659D.2000408@gmail.com> <F89B607A-EC62-41F8-8138-268F0C89A1FF@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <F89B607A-EC62-41F8-8138-268F0C89A1FF@piuha.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=595; t=1379689722; x=1380553722; c=relaxed/simple; s=thundersaddle.kirkwood; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=mtcc.com; i=mike@mtcc.com; z=From:=20Michael=20Thomas=20<mike@mtcc.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[homenet]=20APPSDIR=20review=20of=20dra ft-ietf-homenet-arch-10 |Sender:=20 |To:=20homenet@ietf.org |Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3DISO-8859-1=3B=20 format=3Dflowed |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit |MIME-Version:=201.0; bh=OyCSQvBE4pdn5Ln0kSd+b6K3DmAXz9xnzCH5cn/cbUY=; b=Fj6lfE1DpWk91Y44sx9c02/98lmn9xRwNFxMa3k82alCWROAOh5ADo6b7F CvvG8in4T8Fne2ndS7an7sprZ4kRUu+N4VytPQHIyXuqD3nfQzUl+2P+z/Rc H/9GxkV0ATeZ/m0bdyLrs5gNTRpu0qYaAPABY8kEt37Lz0USUn2Q4=;
Authentication-Results: ; v=0.1; dkim=pass header.i=mike@mtcc.com ( sig from mtcc.com/thundersaddle.kirkwood verified; ); dkim-asp=pass header.From=mike@mtcc.com
Subject: Re: [homenet] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:08:48 -0000

On 9/20/13 8:04 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
>> I believe the draft meets the charter goals. It's certainly a snapshot,
>> and should be labelled as such, but it isn't intended to stray much
>> outside layer 3, and shouldn't.
>>
>> Whether work is need in the application eco-system for home networks
>> is a separate discussion.
> FWIW, I agree with Brian. (And I'm speaking as an author and WG participant, not with my AD hat on.)
>

For the benefit of those of us who weren't in Berlin, can somebody outline what
the relationship is between this group and the (m?)dnsext bof/wg?

Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email