IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 20 September 2013 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F7021F93F8; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.554
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.045, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OiqtVgBCDmPU; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98AD21F9D52; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.153.197]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8KITq9B003059 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1379701807; bh=XW2cojEeY7TdIHmhEOkXkXT0ONG/Xj/z0ZLfnkJA7As=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=inC4WneuJB6ZIOwD81Yrfp1QrWDaWlR/6j0VG96JOUgGa06A0x4R/Zfr8JT6W5LLu jU3+uMuN9oNjH9tQkHnE6pK2sr9y9U6bMX7Ccu1qqPmxS9qm+8M3N2uSj2aJmVgU1P Y/BuvXmxDjrY4HXFeYJwE+ZqfbEZ4TDuKQiDtnlg=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1379701807; i=@elandsys.com; bh=XW2cojEeY7TdIHmhEOkXkXT0ONG/Xj/z0ZLfnkJA7As=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=e7xLFe7s9V3mqAGhUpEpkFIpSd/sMPwvX/PEMaHFqcZv0SEAue0wKhk67SP3lFL1V TAg7R+CZx2/EilSvQ5VWc+cRlUlkI9DBNbPdBzMyc0MVMzbG1AoELrhMXL+2MWw+6F tsTdSSdm07GlBX4DWOeilPXB6Z1NYvbmdxdqcnUw=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130920100656.0c72ae18@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:27:24 -0700
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|cd4ebcca46d42785cd54092a595dde4bp8JHc103tjc|ecs.soto n.ac.uk|D70FE083-3DB8-477F-B229-E54C4259FE8C@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130914143222.0b9590f0@elandnews.com> <C4F6B742-3784-48BA-8B97-BE3B8972DC39@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|72d902bbed65dc8b06cf46c298d30fe1p8I0CV03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|C4F6B742-3784-48BA-8B97-BE3B8972DC39@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <6.2.5.6.2.20130918225335.0d0e2478@elandnews.com> <D70FE083-3DB8-477F-B229-E54C4259FE8C@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|cd4ebcca46d42785cd54092a595dde4bp8JHc103tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|D70FE083-3DB8-477F-B229-E54C4259FE8C@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, homenet@ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-homenet-arch.all@tools.ietf.org, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Subject: Re: [homenet] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 18:30:46 -0000

Hi Tim,
At 09:37 20-09-2013, Tim Chown wrote:
>Apologies for the grievous chop in the above included text, but I 
>think it's worth adding here that the dnssdext proposed charter 
>(under review by the IESG currently I believe) focuses on service 
>discovery, and has been steered away from naming issues. It instead 
>proposes to document the issues arising. But additionally, thanks to 
>Toerless, the proposed charter not only talk about the networking 
>elements of a SD solution, but also what the API would look like to 
>application developers who may be advertising or discovering the services.
>
>As per Mike's question today, the relationship between homenet and a 
>potential dnssdext WG would need further clarification, but there is 
>overlap and there are some mutual interests.

Pete Resnick explained why the APPSDIR review was requested ( 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg10461.html 
).  The follow-up on the review is getting more difficult as what is 
being discussed in the document is related to a working group and a 
proposed working group (dnssdext).

Please note that I am okay with your previous message (see 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg10475.html 
).  Someone will have to pick a path forward and we can take it from there.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email