IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 24 September 2013 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8B711E8142; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8KuPJnzzX4WH; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3::184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA5911E815C; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE252016E; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 12:27:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id D924B63B18; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:18:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4EB63848; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:18:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130918225335.0d0e2478@elandnews.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130914143222.0b9590f0@elandnews.com> <C4F6B742-3784-48BA-8B97-BE3B8972DC39@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|72d902bbed65dc8b06cf46c298d30fe1p8I0CV03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|C4F6B742-3784-48BA-8B97-BE3B8972DC39@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <6.2.5.6.2.20130918225335.0d0e2478@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:18:11 -0400
Message-ID: <14439.1380035891@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-homenet-arch.all@tools.ietf.org, homenet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 15:18:40 -0000

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
    > The intent of my comment was not about adding more text, or
    > application-specific considerations, to the document.  The title of the
    > document is "Home Networking Architecture for IPv6".  My guess is that

I believe that perhaps the title is now wrong.
I think that it should say:
    "Requirements for Home Networking for IPv6"

(But, it's really more than requirements. It's just less than architecture)

I think that we can't really write the architecture until we are clear
what the tradeoffsof the final consensus solution is.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email