Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next?
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 02 March 2019 00:14 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A75612D7EA for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2019 16:14:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79mzKoeSi1LB for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2019 16:14:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69C2F130E77 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Mar 2019 16:14:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2FC3826B for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Mar 2019 19:14:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id C486D1808; Fri, 1 Mar 2019 19:14:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21356D9 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Mar 2019 19:14:30 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: homenet@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <dbe6e19f-84c2-f2eb-b9ab-d085de7c299c@mtcc.com>
References: <894b4181-c4ca-5cf1-adba-1c5fcab0d355@cs.tcd.ie> <90A48EC1-C13D-4B9B-9F04-252C0CC87084@fugue.com> <dbe6e19f-84c2-f2eb-b9ab-d085de7c299c@mtcc.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2019 19:14:30 -0500
Message-ID: <4803.1551485670@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/1spogc2PhxI6g-vURVuSwe0n9Ho>
Subject: Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2019 00:14:36 -0000
Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> wrote: > I would guess that even after 5 years, we still don't have much v6 > deployment > into homes and that's a pretty big problem. Router vendors are not much > motivated by that which doesn't have a market. Cable ISPs in north america (Rogers, Comcast) seem to be turning more and more IPv6 on daily. I am going by increasingly visible IPv6 (including ULAs, btw) at local pubs/restaurants/coffee shops. But, IPv6 is at this point, a non-event for users (that's good that they don't notice, btw). I personally do not believe that Home Router firmware update practices have significantly improved. I would welcome more recent data: is anyone collecting this on a regular basis? I suspect that 90% of firmware updates occur because the (integrated) modem is replaced in order to upgrade bandwidth. For the last 10 to 15 years the ISP-provided home router has come to dominate the market, with the belief by the ISPs that this is a MUST that they control the device. Many (but not all) at the IETF do not share this view, but most non-technical users see the ISP provided router is simply saving the trip to BestBuy, rather than an abdication of control over their home. If this trend continues, then I believe that ISPs (residential IAPs) will come to want to control all IoT devices in the home -- because security -- telling residential customers what they can and not connect. I believe that this direction will result in ISPs being 100% liable for attacks on critical infrastructure; I don't think that this is a place that ISPs want to be, but I'm not sure that they have understood this yet. It's clearly not in Amazon/Google/Facebook/Intel/Samsung/insert-another-IoT-conglomerate's interest to be told by ISPs what their products may or may not do. This is an ongoing tussle that that relates in some ways (but not all) to the net neutrality debate and the desire my ISPs for a cut of the over-top-pie. My answer is that the consumer should be in control, and that ISPs need to get out of the home router business entirely. Home router vendors (or the service companies they create) should provide first-level support for issues, and actual real connectivity issues should be submitted electronically. Not so different in the way that my furnace maintenance is not provided by my gas supplier, but my gas supplier gets to inspect the hookup. When we started this effort we heard of real situations such as Fred's original FUN BOF slides on how dual-geek households are forced not to share printers due to corporate home firewall requirements. And that we should expect the situation to get worse. Those slides are close to ten years old. I'd like to know if they are still at relevant. Maybe they aren't. If not, why not? -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Michael Thomas
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Michael Thomas
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Michael Richardson
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Michael Thomas
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Ralf Weber
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Michael Thomas
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Michael Richardson
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? STARK, BARBARA H
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
- [homenet] -CoDel David R. Oran
- Re: [homenet] -CoDel Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Michael Richardson
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next? Michael Richardson