Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next?

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> Sun, 03 March 2019 01:50 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@irif.fr>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DD31288BD for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 17:50:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YH3KADo_xf3g for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 17:50:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33B831200D8 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 17:50:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id x231oLsS028367; Sun, 3 Mar 2019 02:50:21 +0100
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00DF474D7B; Sun, 3 Mar 2019 02:50:29 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id c1CF8X8izgR6; Sun, 3 Mar 2019 02:50:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pirx.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C06BE74D79; Sun, 3 Mar 2019 02:50:23 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2019 02:50:20 +0100
Message-ID: <87bm2s680z.wl-jch@irif.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <2B9C4EC0-7BE3-40E4-8AB4-C569916A9A6E@fugue.com>
References: <894b4181-c4ca-5cf1-adba-1c5fcab0d355@cs.tcd.ie> <90A48EC1-C13D-4B9B-9F04-252C0CC87084@fugue.com> <dbe6e19f-84c2-f2eb-b9ab-d085de7c299c@mtcc.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114E0C50C4@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <ed1e6a2c-b830-07fb-df0d-df6dae96cdd9@mtcc.com> <87fts55jdi.wl-jch@irif.fr> <2B9C4EC0-7BE3-40E4-8AB4-C569916A9A6E@fugue.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Sun, 03 Mar 2019 02:50:21 +0100 (CET)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5C7B32DD.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5C7B32DD.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@irif.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5C7B32DD.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/gQZ9oApGs4bBchZQbjh6ywPX9IU>
Subject: Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2019 01:50:31 -0000

>     Both HNCP and Babel carry their control traffic over link-local IPv6, but
>     they support both IPv4 and IPv6 with almost equal functionality.

> in fact while what you are saying is technically true, in practice IPv4
> _is_ treated like a second-class citizen in the sense that if your
> ISP-provided public IP address ever goes away, all of your RFC1918
> addresses on the homenet also go away.

That's an property of the hnetd implementation, not a feature of the
protocol (and it doesn't apply to shncpd).  See RFC 7788 Section 6.5.

> This is one of the reasons that I would like us to get together and hack on
> this at the hackathon:

It should be an easy fix, feel free to go ahead.

-- Juliusz