Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next?

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 07 March 2019 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68095120106 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 06:51:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ePHc0HJ2lWy for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 06:51:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2390112008F for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 06:51:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00BBCBF10 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 14:51:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Sy0ckKcY2hB for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 14:51:35 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [134.226.36.93] (unknown [134.226.36.93]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7251BF0F for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 14:51:35 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1551970295; bh=XtU9n41oDGfLbnVf2IBllOlPbFvzMp1T61YChwRC/v0=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Rwc7DmPmsT2iMW082DIg5gc1O+nQKGkoNuEkpBrP75S3YR/EFWZZ0IqvvFuHtJ3jC hsGiY4b4b2TfkKvWJiclZC7/o5A1mt1JukoTjEyMCENF0bvE2avhO07c6oDuFq+Yzr PewhTJUuZO5ee08Z99X0PYZSIftg5Fh64+pGn7ao=
To: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
References: <894b4181-c4ca-5cf1-adba-1c5fcab0d355@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=5BB5A6EA5765D2C5863CAE275AB2FAF17B172BEA; url=
Autocrypt: addr=stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFo9UDIBEADUH4ZPcUnX5WWRWO4kEkHea5Y5eEvZjSwe/YA+G0nrTuOU9nemCP5PMvmh 5Cg8gBTyWyN4Z2+O25p9Tja5zUb+vPMWYvOtokRrp46yhFZOmiS5b6kTq0IqYzsEv5HI58S+ QtaFq978CRa4xH9Gi9u4yzUmT03QNIGDXE37honcAM4MOEtEgvw4fVhVWJuyy3w//0F2tzKr EMjmL5VGuD/Q9+G/7abuXiYNNd9ZFjv4625AUWwy+pAh4EKzS1FE7BOZp9daMu9MUQmDqtZU bUv0Q+DnQAB/4tNncejJPz0p2z3MWCp5iSwHiQvytYgatMp34a50l6CWqa13n6vY8VcPlIqO Vz+7L+WiVfxLbeVqBwV+4uL9to9zLF9IyUvl94lCxpscR2kgRgpM6A5LylRDkR6E0oudFnJg b097ZaNyuY1ETghVB5Uir1GCYChs8NUNumTHXiOkuzk+Gs4DAHx/a78YxBolKHi+esLH8r2k 4LyM2lp5FmBKjG7cGcpBGmWavACYEa7rwAadg4uBx9SHMV5i33vDXQUZcmW0vslQ2Is02NMK 7uB7E7HlVE1IM1zNkVTYYGkKreU8DVQu8qNOtPVE/CdaCJ/pbXoYeHz2B1Nvbl9tlyWxn5Xi HzFPJleXc0ksb9SkJokAfwTSZzTxeQPER8la5lsEEPbU/cDTcwARAQABtDJTdGVwaGVuIEZh cnJlbGwgKDIwMTcpIDxzdGVwaGVuLmZhcnJlbGxAY3MudGNkLmllPokCQAQTAQgAKgIbAwUJ CZQmAAULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAUCWj6jdwIZAQAKCRBasvrxexcr6o7QD/9m x9DPJetmW794RXmNTrbTJ44zc/tJbcLdRBh0KBn9OW/EaAqjDmgNJeCMyJTKr1ywaps8HGUN hLEVkc14NUpgi4/Zkrbi3DmTp25OHj6wXBS5qVMyVynTMEIjOfeFFyxG+48od+Xn7qg6LT7G rHeNf+z/r0v9+8eZ1Ip63kshQDGhhpmRMKu4Ws9ZvTW2ACXkkTFaSGYJj3yIP4R6IgwBYGMz DXFX6nS4LA1s3pcPNxOgrvCyb60AiJZTLcOk/rRrpZtXB1XQc23ZZmrlTkl2HaThL6w3YKdi Ti1NbuMeOxZqtXcUshII45sANm4HuWNTiRh93Bn5bN6ddjgsaXEZBKUBuUaPBl7gQiQJcAlS 3MmGgVS4ZoX8+VaPGpXdQVFyBMRFlOKOC5XJESt7wY0RE2C8PFm+5eywSO/P1fkl9whkMgml 3OEuIQiP2ehRt/HVLMHkoM9CPQ7t6UwdrXrvX+vBZykav8x9U9M6KTgfsXytxUl6Vx5lPMLi 2/Jrsz6Mzh/IVZa3xjhq1OLFSI/tT2ji4FkJDQbO+yYUDhcuqfakDmtWLMxecZsY6O58A/95 8Qni6Xeq+Nh7zJ7wNcQOMoDGj+24di2TX1cKLzdDMWFaWzlNP5dB5VMwS9Wqj1Z6TzKjGjru q8soqohwb2CK9B3wzFg0Bs1iBI+2RuFnxLkCDQRaPVAyARAA+g3R0HzGr/Dl34Y07XqGqzq5 SU0nXIu9u8Ynsxj7gR5qb3HgUWYEWrHW2jHOByXnvkffucf5yzwrsvw8Q8iI8CFHiTYHPpey 4yPVn6R0w/FOMcY70eTIu/k6EEFDlDbs09DtKcrsT9bmN0XoRxITlXwWTufYqUnmS+YkAuk+ TLCtUin7OdaS2uU6Ata3PLQSeM2ZsUQMmYmHPwB9rmf+q2I005AJ9Q1SPQ2KNg/8xOGxo13S VuaSqYRQdpV93RuCOzg4vuXtR+gP0KQrus/P2ZCEPvU9cXF/2MIhXgOz207lv3iE2zGyNXld /n8spvWk+0bH5Zqd9Wcba/rGcBhmX9NKKDARZqjkv/zVEP1X97w1HsNYeUFNcg2lk9zQKb4v l1jx/Uz8ukzH2QNhU4R39dbF/4AwWuSVkGW6bTxHJqGs6YimbfdQqxTzmqFwz3JP0OtXX5q/ 6D4pHwcmJwEiDNzsBLl6skPSQ0Xyq3pua/qAP8MVm+YxCxJQITqZ8qjDLzoe7s9X6FLLC/DA L9kxl5saVSfDbuI3usH/emdtn0NA9/M7nfgih92zD92sl1yQXHT6BDa8xW1j+RU4P+E0wyd7 zgB2UeYgrp2IIcfG+xX2uFG5MJQ/nYfBoiALb0+dQHNHDtFnNGY3Oe8z1M9c5aDG3/s29QbJ +w7hEKKo9YMAEQEAAYkCJQQYAQgADwUCWj1QMgIbDAUJCZQmAAAKCRBasvrxexcr6qwvD/9b Rek3kfN8Q+jGrKl8qwY8HC5s4mhdDJZI/JP2FImf5J2+d5/e8UJ4fcsT79E0/FqX3Z9wZr6h sofPqLh1/YzDsYkZDHTYSGrlWGP/I5kXwUmFnBZHzM3WGrL3S7ZmCYMdudhykxXXjq7M6Do1 oxM8JofrXGtwBTLv5wfvvygJouVCVe87Ge7mCeY5vey1eUi4zSSF1zPpR6gg64w2g4TXM5qt SwkZVOv1g475LsGlYWRuJV8TA67yp1zJI7HkNqCo8KyHX0DPOh9c+Sd9ZX4aqKfqH9HIpnCL AYEgj7vofeix7gM3kQQmwynqq32bQGQBrKJEYp2vfeO30VsVx4dzuuiC5lyjUccVmw5D72J0 FlGrfEm0kw6D1qwyBg0SAMqamKN6XDdjhNAtXIaoA2UMZK/vZGGUKbqTgDdk0fnzOyb2zvXK CiPFKqIPAqKaDHg0JHdGI3KpQdRNLLzgx083EqEc6IAwWA6jSz+6lZDV6XDgF0lYqAYIkg3+ 6OUXUv6plMlwSHquiOc/MQXHfgUP5//Ra5JuiuyCj954FD+MBKIj8eWROfnzyEnBplVHGSDI ZLzL3pvV14dcsoajdeIH45i8DxnVm64BvEFHtLNlnliMrLOrk4shfmWyUqNlzilXN2BTFVFH 4MrnagFdcFnWYp1JPh96ZKjiqBwMv/H0kw==
Message-ID: <fef953de-6278-f810-242b-423dae2c3aa1@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 14:51:33 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <894b4181-c4ca-5cf1-adba-1c5fcab0d355@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PgK9iAUimBx3mMt74OV0xY4w2SHEuOiS4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/eOtC2LMraOPVrlv5FVN-JvFkIuQ>
Subject: Re: [homenet] homenet: what now? ... next?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 14:51:42 -0000

Hi all,

We'd really appreciate more feedback on this topic,
so could you please take a few minutes to give us
some more guidance on where you want to see the
work go from here...

Thanks,
S.

On 01/03/2019 21:21, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> Dear WG,
> 
> At IETF-103 Ted lead a good discussion of where we're at and where we
> and others in the homenet space may be heading. One key aspect of that
> discussion is that we might (or might not) be working on specs that have
> been overtaken by events e.g. in the sense that perhaps there are now
> sufficient other options that people are less likely to implement the
> specs we currently have as WG documents.
> 
> As chairs, we have also noted the relative lack of activity on the list
> in recent months, which could also be related to a lack of interest in
> implementing and deploying our current WG drafts.
> 
> We'd therefore like to have a discussion on the list, between now
> and IETF-104 as to what the WG ought be doing.
> 
> It's fine to offer general opinions, but as a way to break it down, we
> basically have two bits of work in-hand: (a) work on simple naming [1]
> and (b) the drafts on handling names with help from your ISP. [2,3]
> (We also have a chartered work item [4] on security that has seen no
> progress but you can comment on that as item (c) if you like;-)
> 
> Ted also has some concrete ideas for work to do at the upcoming
> hackathon. We've asked him to start a separate thread on that and
> would love to see people participate in that.
> 
> We think there are a few potential positions that participants in the
> discussion may have (or end up having) with respect to each of those,
> perhaps:
> 
> (1) it's great work and I plan to implement or deploy - see
>     you at the hackathon!
> (2) it's great work and I'll be actively engaged with it in
>     the coming months reviewing drafts and posting to the
>     list
> (3) I do care about this stuff getting done, but I don't have
>     the time/management interest to spend the time I'd like.
> (4) I'm not that interested in this stuff, but I don't object,
>     and I'll read some drafts as I'm able to.
> (5) it's fine stuff, but IMO not going to be used, so there's
>     not much point in producing RFCs
> (6) not sure at the moment, maybe the WG should go quiescent for
>     a while 'till we know more
> 
> If one of those positions captures your opinion, feel free to respond
> in shorthand. Otherwise, please tell us where you think we ought be
> going, as a WG, with (a), (b) and/or (c).
> 
> To be clear, we're happy to proceed according to the consensus of the
> WG participants whatever that may be. That could mean trying to
> accelerate some work, or closing down the WG, or anything in between,
> assuming we see enough engagement in discussion and that there's a
> rough consensus that we can call.
> 
> As chairs, we want to allow plenty of time for this, and are considering
> devoting (part of) a f2f session to bottoming out on this topic at
> IETF-104 if that's needed, but we'd like to be reassured that the WG
> think we're working on the right things now, and that those are likely
> to be implemented and hopefully deployed.
> 
> We'd really appreciate it if you can send an initial response to
> this mail in the next week so we can start to build an agenda for
> our session at IETF-104.
> 
> Thanks
> B&S. (As chairs)
> 
> 
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-homenet-simple-naming
> [2]
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation
> [3]
> https://tools.ietf.org/wg/homenet/draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options/
> [4] https://tools.ietf.org/wg/homenet/charters
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>