IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Principles doc

Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> Thu, 12 June 2014 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4CA81A0127 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 08:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9t-IKlzn7TqW for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 08:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DC021A0113 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 08:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/46573) with ESMTP id s5CFceL9003195; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 17:38:40 +0200
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354FB29A7FC; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 17:22:23 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr
Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id TdqinQKYEfYu; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 17:22:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ijon.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0318029A7FA; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 17:22:21 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 17:22:49 +0200
Message-ID: <871tuuup86.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
To: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <CFBF0B6F.31242%acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
References: <BEB843C7-EB1D-486A-A9A1-B99D48775D33@nominet.org.uk> <C4696B2C-C08A-492C-A640-89BA25C3D4C9@iki.fi> <50B1C7AA-6909-4557-88C4-D064C9229BDA@fugue.com> <877g4murgj.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <CFBF0B6F.31242%acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Thu, 12 Jun 2014 17:38:40 +0200 (CEST)
X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 5399C980.005 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)!
X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 5399C980.005 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/<jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 5399C980.005 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/AvPORHMoW04UD2fZhTt0MdLtDXE
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Principles doc
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:38:44 -0000

> I was involved in this discussion

I'm genuinely sorry to hear that, Acee.

> the statement was merely an attempt to capture the fact that the
> existing unicast IGP routing protocols would meet the homenet
> requirements [...] while BGP would not be precluded, BGP's rich routing
> policy is not viewed as being required in the homenet.

Was it meant to preclude or discourage the following:

  * route selection involving hysteresis;
  * radio interference avoidance;
  * cross-layer metric computation techniques?

If it wasn't, then somebody didn't do their homework.  If it was, then
somebody needs to drop by on this list to explain their position to us.

-- Juliusz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email