Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Principles doc
Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net> Sat, 14 June 2014 15:18 UTC
Return-Path: <v6ops@globis.net>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCF41B286F for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 08:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DTyCqeg4niaX for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 08:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from globis01.globis.net (mail.globis.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f15:62e::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45811A038B for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 08:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by globis01.globis.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C95871517; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 17:18:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from globis01.globis.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.globis.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PyY4lpcfZl76; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 17:18:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Rays-iMac.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f15:73a:749f:2481:2ef4:998d]) (Authenticated sender: Ray.Hunter@globis.net) by globis01.globis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90A05870056; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 17:18:18 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <539C67AA.4030501@globis.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 17:18:02 +0200
From: Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Macintosh/20140602)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
References: <BEB843C7-EB1D-486A-A9A1-B99D48775D33@nominet.org.uk> <85F978F4-1293-4F9E-B5C7-068F95A0B626@nominet.org.uk> <CAKD1Yr2mzZOvCDwyyEZHef1rk5PAxtNZRVRys43SXnD=gVxLBA@mail.gmail.com> <143C7553-11D4-41A9-910E-FAD26F484635@fugue.com> <CAKD1Yr0hr8Pa_QU_9mjRjbxffQ=mdgOWYSQUyLc5ewkpuf5OmA@mail.gmail.com> <F08A2136-E88F-4785-BE01-14D386B9C2D9@fugue.com> <CAKD1Yr1nhnvG2H_9eeW-Dono3cZqYaxMZaCR1vcueOQgW4xqYQ@mail.gmail.com> <E66DDB31-C318-4025-BF8A-15F2336A2A08@fugue.com> <B289FE60-E0C7-4D3B-BE21-3C7109FAC69C@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|c9eee95ab0d06c016200d4557ca869f9q5CFPa03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|B289FE60-E0C7-4D3B-BE21-3C7109FAC69C@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <539C51BA.6030901@globis.net> <87d2ebbmad.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
In-Reply-To: <87d2ebbmad.wl%jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/cFAfdf-jA37qbK2GbgwNkCWx2os
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Principles doc
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:18:21 -0000
> Juliusz Chroboczek <mailto:jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> > 14 June 2014 16:25 >> Is a specific update address preferred? >> [my view] The routing protocol should support both use of unicast and >> multicast updates. > > Please clarify. Are you saying that the routing protocol must be able to > run over link layers that don't support link-local multicast? AFAIK, > link-local multicast is part of the base IPv6 spec. Multicast has issues on some link topologies (e.g. where it has to be emulated), and in situations where devices attempt to sleep for as long as possible. So even though link-local multicast may be part of the IPv6 base spec, it may be desirable to avoid use of multicast traffic where possible. e.g. a routing protocol could perform initial neighbor discovery using multicast, but then switch to unicast when maintaining individual neighbor associations on the longer term, or for exchanging information with specific neighbors. >> Multi-path support? >> [my view] yes. >> [this is in the current architecture document] > > Then I think I don't understand what is meant by "multi-path support". Is > that merely the ability to switch to a better route if one becomes > available? Or is there something more to it? Could you please clarify? > > -- Juliusz I don't know that there is a single definition. "The inclusion of physical layer characteristics including bandwidth, loss, and latency in path computation should be considered for optimising communication in the homenet." I interpret the above text as requesting an ability to perform load balancing over equal cost paths, potentially taking into account packet loss and link quality when selecting which stream to send over which link. Another possible interpretation of the text would be an ability to route packets based on traffic type, e.g. policy based routing of video traffic over a different link to FTP. Or a combination of the above. If you have a better interpretation or definition then please share. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Regards, RayH
- [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Princip… Ray Bellis
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Markus Stenberg
- [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Princip… Ray Bellis
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Markus Stenberg
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Mark Townsley
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Townsley.net
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Acee Lindem
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Townsley.net
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Michael Thomas
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Michael Thomas
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Acee Lindem
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ray Hunter
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Michael Richardson
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Michael Richardson
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Markus Stenberg
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Tim Chown
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Mark Townsley
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Tim Chown
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Tim Chown
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Mark Townsley
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Tim Chown
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Mark Townsley
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Mark Townsley
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ray Hunter
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ray Hunter
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ray Hunter
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ray Hunter
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Acee Lindem
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Gert Doering
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Tim Chown
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… ietfdbh
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… joel jaeggli
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Tim Chown
- Re: [homenet] Updates to Homenet Architecture Pri… Ray Hunter
- Re: [homenet] list of questions on routing sectio… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [homenet] list of questions on routing section Alexandru Petrescu