IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Fri, 20 September 2013 22:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@mtcc.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4E121F9A05 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.600, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xorbeC8ffyOh for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtcc.com (mtcc.com [50.0.18.224]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B250121F9EB6 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from michael-thomass-macbook.local (aric.mtcc.com [50.0.18.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mtcc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r8KMqL1t010818 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:52:22 -0700
Message-ID: <523CD1A2.2040006@mtcc.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:52:18 -0700
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: homenet@ietf.org
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130914143222.0b9590f0@elandnews.com> <C4F6B742-3784-48BA-8B97-BE3B8972DC39@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|72d902bbed65dc8b06cf46c298d30fe1p8I0CV03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|C4F6B742-3784-48BA-8B97-BE3B8972DC39@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <6.2.5.6.2.20130918225335.0d0e2478@elandnews.com> <E01ACFFF-CA8F-4280-8CE0-2CC57E6270EE@nominum.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130919074156.0cd2d900@elandnews.com> <3105F809-7E03-41D9-A634-DE32446FB19B@nominum.com> <523B659D.2000408@gmail.com> <F89B607A-EC62-41F8-8138-268F0C89A1FF@piuha.net> <523C64F7.5080107@mtcc.com> <82F09828-CA33-4378-8B09-3B4B6F4764FA@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <82F09828-CA33-4378-8B09-3B4B6F4764FA@fugue.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=926; t=1379717543; x=1380581543; c=relaxed/simple; s=thundersaddle.kirkwood; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=mtcc.com; i=mike@mtcc.com; z=From:=20Michael=20Thomas=20<mike@mtcc.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[homenet]=20APPSDIR=20review=20of=20dra ft-ietf-homenet-arch-10 |Sender:=20 |To:=20homenet@ietf.org |Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3DISO-8859-1=3B=20 format=3Dflowed |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit |MIME-Version:=201.0; bh=OVs+jJcs/61Jo+ysnKnGikHHZwXeQ0dFdToye0DTnbc=; b=PE9bja87jEoM3E1ccEOV+T2UglUueJ26jBD/v+Wg998juiSru6yAhgrVwo tv5LIhe9XoOtI6IMr7nT+d5gebXGEZe41ZjX86v/950JUGtANmLPLj+aPvaj fZmVZzVz/qfSgqDr4Ix7qSJnJxR8vPky8gmM2RRlkhu4kdph1PUHM=;
Authentication-Results: ; v=0.1; dkim=pass header.i=mike@mtcc.com ( sig from mtcc.com/thundersaddle.kirkwood verified; ); dkim-asp=pass header.From=mike@mtcc.com
Subject: Re: [homenet] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-homenet-arch-10
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 22:52:34 -0000

On 9/20/13 1:49 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Sep 20, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> wrote:
>> For the benefit of those of us who weren't in Berlin, can somebody outline what
>> the relationship is between this group and the (m?)dnsext bof/wg?
> Homenet would be an obvious customer for some of the work that's planned to be done in dnssdext.
>

What would be nice to know is what Homenet owes the rest of the world on the
naming front. It's always seemed that the naming problem in the charter is sort of a
redheaded stepchild, and the formation of dnssdext has further muddied the waters.
If there's really not enough ergs to work on the home naming problem here, that would
be ok so long as a new group could be spun up when there's enough interest mated
with the ability to follow through. What would really be unhappy is if it were just an
afterthought; it deserves better than that.

Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email